The Results Pick Pocketing Offenders Perspective

The Criminal Law Amendment pick-pocketing acts as a special typeof theft conviction. Perpetrator pick pocketing, not required achieving agreater amount or the circumstances are serious, they can follow the theftpunishment. From the nature of pick pocketing, analyzes the results ofbehavioral elements and elements of pick pocketing. Place characteristicbehavior of pick pocketing and define object characteristics pick pocketing.Results from pick pocketing to analyze established and consummatedstandard pick-pocketing, and attempted to analyze and pick pocketing.Finally is the judicial application pick-pocketing. The thesis is dividedinto four parts.The first part is the nature of pocketing behavior. Believe that ourdistinction between acts committed by offenders and the results of thestandard is "consummated standard says." Further elaborate pick pocketingis a result of guilty. Pick pocketing crime consummated, not only havebehavioral elements, but also a result of factors.The second part is the behavior of the elements picks pocketing. Placeof pick pocketing implemented features and object features pick-defined.Analysis of the behavior of picks pocketing. Pick pocketing is not requiredto consider the behavior of the perpetrator has inertia, does not require asecret theft, pick pocketing behavior does not require having technicalmeans.The third part is the result of pick pocketing elements. Founded pickpocketing behavior must be a body of material possessions and valuablenature. Accomplished standard pick pocketing crime to take "control said."After the implementation of pick pocketing perpetrator, the criminal law isnot made to protect property, attempted theft.The fourth part is the judicial application pick-pocketing. Analysis of Article13of the Criminal Code applies to coordinate pick-pocketing andexplain pickpocket crime can be turned into a robbery.Finally is the conclusion. Summarize basic ideas.