On The Judicial Authentication Of Pick-pocketing

The amendment of the criminal law of the People's Republic of China eight article 39 have modified the provisions of article 264 of the original,in addition to the large amount of theft,theft many times,adding three behaviors: pick-pocketing,a burglary and theft crime with lethal weapons,with strict and comprehensive against and punishing crimes committed theft.Before the pickpockets are generally used as illegal acts in violation of security administration punishment law,administrative sanctions shall be imposed,pick-pocketing conform to the relatively large or pickpockets in public three times two years or more.However,some of the judicial organs in handling cases of pick-pocketing,moving law and judicial interpretation on it,not based on the case.In order to solve crimes,many people ignored the social harmfulness caused by theft has reached and exceed the proviso more than the plot and mild,pick-pocketing are into crime and criminal compulsory measures are taken.The law of the People's Republic of China criminal law article 13 "proviso" clearly stipulates: obviously minor plot of harmless,don't think it is a crime.The judicial organs thought pickpockets into sin,wrenched the meaning of legislators,so we should be strict with pick-pocketing,to prevent the administrative illegal behavior into criminal at the entrance to the first line of the well off,to avoid negative impact to the greatest extent is of important significance.After the amendment issued,some judicial organs ignoring the pickpockets punishment,still regarded as ordinary theft,seriously affected the judicial justice.As a result,the cognizance of thepublic security organs of pick-pocketing punishment right or not,it is of profound significance to the judicial practice of our country fair.