Case Analysis Of Administrative Reconsideration Of Lai Sued Guangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau

In2004,as the result of Lai sued Guangzhou municipal public security bureau for refusing to accept the traffic peccancy photos as evidence, the bureau’s public administration new attempt failed, which was encouraging citizens to help traffic police department with traffic peccancy issues by collecting the traffic peccancy photos they take. The court ruled that traffic peccancy photos taken by citizens cannot be directly presented as evidence for administrative penalty. Once the final determination was made, the legal effect came up immediately. But Guangzhou Intermediate People’s Court of the obtain evidence portion and the question of civil participation in the administrative law enforcement in this case which has far exceeded the significance of the the case.The National Judicial Examination in2004uses Taking Traffic Peccancy Photographs set to case analysis to make visible that contains unlimited researching value.The decision of the court seems questing for judicial authority.it makes other cities which imitates the example of Taking Traffic Peccancy Photographs shrinking back at the sight.The administrative office which has reflections and innovation in administrative execution dismissed the idea,too.Encouraging individual citizens to participate administrative law enforcement and innovation in administrative execution are very important problems.It requires us to correct traditional administrative ideas and establish a way of thinking that is inventive.In our country,the contention of individual citizens participating administrative law enforcement is without merit which pose a greatest obstacle to progress.By analyzing the problems:first,admissibility of photographs which made with citizen,second,encouraging individual citizens to participate administrative law enforcement.The paper put forward some of the suggestions to perfect the preferential rules.