Study On Pain Threshold Load And Balance Function Of Knee OA Patients Before And After Training

Object:Knee OA (Osteoarthritis, OA) is a common disease, and osseous arthritis disease destroys the human knee joint biomechanics distribution, causes pain, lowers the levels of balance function of knee joint function, increases the fall risk of patients, and exerts serious influence on patient’s quality of life.This paper aims to evaluate the impacts of rehabilitation trainings to the patients who are suffering knee osteoarthritis, and to explore the diagnosis and treatment of rehabilitation training mechanism and significance of knee osteoarthritis for the treatment of the disease providing a worthy reference of practical and feasible method.Method:In this paper, the method of group comparison was used.40patients with knee osteoarthritis but have the ability to walk10m were randomly divided into two groups.30of them were in the experimental group, in which all the members will participate in regular training, and10of them were in the control group which have no conventional training. Tecnobody dynamic static balance function tester was used to collect and analyze following data of two group patients for4weeks treatment.The data sources include B position, F position, H position antero-posterior axis, left-right axis, A2-A6axis, A4-A8axis. Circumference of the stability index of dynamic balance, and pain threshold load of sick side.Result:1. Before and4weeks after the treatment, the statistically significant difference about several stability index of the healthy side and ill side unilateral from experimental group patients, under three position,is existed(p<0.05); Statistically significant difference of A2-A6axis stability index and heathy side unilateral stability index before and4weeks after the treatment is existed(p<0.05); there is no significant difference of left-right axis, A4-A8axis and circumference stability index(p>0.05); All those shows rehabilitation training exerts influence on patients’ healthy and ill side.After4weeks, the statistically significant difference about several stability index of the health side and sick side from patients of control group, under B position, is existed(p<0.05), while the remaining is no statistically significant difference(p>0.05). Statistically significant difference of A2-A6axis and antero-posterior axles of heath side stability index is existed(p <0.05); there is no significant difference of left-right axis, A4-A8axis and circumference stability index(p>0.05); H position, statistically significant difference of ill unilateral side is existed(p<0.05), there is a statistically significant difference about health unilateral side anterior-posterior axis, and the left-right axis, and there was no significant difference about A2-A6Axis, A4-A8axis, circumference stability index(p<0.05); H position, the statistically significant difference about several stability index of the sick unilateral side is existed(p<0.05), significant difference about health unilateral side antero-posterior axles, the left-right axis is existed(p<0.05), no significant difference about A2-A6axis, A4-A8shaft circumference stability index(p>0.05).2. Under B position, before and4weeks after the treatment, among the significant difference about experimental group patients’s bilateral side stability index, only antero-posterior shaft stability index was existed(p<0.05), while others(p>0.05); under F position, there was no significant difference about bilateral stability index(p>0.05), but under H position, the fact is converse:bilateral stability index has a statistically significant difference.As to the control group patients, before and4weeks after the treatment, under three positions, significant difference about their bilateral side stability index is existed(p<0.05). It shows there is no obvious difference in the balance function of the gap between the healthy side and the ill side of the patients.3. Before and4weeks after the treatment weeks, statistically significant difference about the two groups’balance stability index is existed(p<0.05)in three positions, and from this, the rehabilitation trainings are more effective than the controls.4. There is the statistically significant difference about the two groups’ pain threshold load before and4weeks after the treatment(p<0.05); There is the statistically significant difference about experimental group’s pain threshold load value after4weeks(p<0.05); There is no statistically significant difference about control group’s pain threshold load value after4weeks(p>0.05). All those data shows that rehabilitation trainings have more impacts on the patients with knee osteoarthritis pain threshold load, and effectively improve the patients suffering from side pain threshold of the load.Conclusion:1. After the rehabilitation trainings, the stability indexes of dynamic balancing capabilities of the patients who have knee osteoarthritis problems have been greatly improved.2. At the same time, with the recovery of the ipsilateral balance function, patients’ contralateral balance function also improves on the original basis.3. Patients after rehabilitation training process, in terms of pain threshold load also showed an upward trend. Increase of the pain threshold load also makes contribution to improve the the ipsilateral balance function and stimulate the health side.