Objective1、The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of rosuvastatin with different doses on ventricular arrhythmias (frequent ventricular premature and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia) in older patients with acute myocardial infarction.2、It was to observe the relation between mortality and rosuvastatin with different doses in the period of3-month follow-up.3、To investigate the safety of rosuvastatin in the elderly.Methods Some130older patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomly divided into three groups:Groups A (with5mg/day rosuvastatin therapy, n=43), Groups B (given1Omg/day rosuvastatin therapy, n=45),Groups C (received20mg/day rosuvastatin therapy, n=42). The frequency of ventricular premature beat (VPB) and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) was recorded via Holter monitoring after hospitalization (24h and72h) and the results were compared.Results1、Ventricular premature beats decreased significantly in the Groups C than the others.(24h, p<0.01;72h, p<0.01). Meanwhile, a significantly reduction in NSVT was seen in the Groups C (24h, p<0.01;72h, p<0.01). But between Groups A and Groups B had no significant differences in reducing ventricular arrhythmias (P>0.01).2、When compared to patients without recorded NSVT, thirty two patients with NSVT share the following characteristics:having myocardial infarction in the past, diabetes mellitus, women, atrial fibrillation, an left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)<40%, left ventricular dimension in diastolic(LVDd)>55mm and few prior statin therapy. There were no side effects observed in all groups during the hospitality and follow-up.Conclusions Early20mg/d rosuvastatin treatment not only can obviously decrease VPB and NSVT but also has good security in elderly patients suffered from acute myocardial infarction. |