A CBCT Comparative Study On Hyoid Position Of Skeletal Class â…¡ And Skeletal Class â… Adolescent Patients | | Posted on:2015-12-16 | Degree:Master | Type:Thesis | | Country:China | Candidate:Y Fu | Full Text:PDF | | GTID:2284330431465152 | Subject:Oral Medicine | | Abstract/Summary: | PDF Full Text Request | | Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the differences between Skeletalclass II and Skeletal class I adolescent patients’ hyoid positions by cone-beamcomputed tomography and InvivoDental5.1software.Methods:45malocclusion patients (Male23, Female22,average age16.78±1.19years old.)were chosen among the250patients(age15-19) in Dalian stomatologicalhospital complaining of malocclusion from January2012to December2013. Accordingto the measuring average of Chinese normal occlusion by Steiner analysis method,patients were divided into two groups: Class I (0.7°≤ANB≤4.7°) and Class II (ANB>4.7°) by ANB angle. All the selected patients met the need of normal-angle range27.3°≤SN-MP≤37.7°. Patients were scanned by KaVo3DeXam cone-beam computedtomography system (CBCT) of America KaVo Company on the same scanningcondition and Craniomaxillary Facial3D images were reconstructed. InvivoDental5.1software was used to measure and analyze the pre-treatment CBCT image about thedifference in hyoid position horizontally and vertically. Obtained data was importedinto SPSS13.0software package so as to establish a database for statistical analysis oftwo independent sample t-test. Only P<0.05was considered statistically significant.Results: Horizontal measured items including distance from hyoid point to anteriorpoint of third cervical vertebraã€distance from hyoid point to Z Plane and distance fromhyoid point to posterior point of chin showed statistically significant difference betweenskeletal Class I group and skeletal Class II group. Vertical measured items includingdistance from hyoid point to FH planeã€distance from hyoid point to maxillary plane anddistance from hyoid point to mandibular plane showed statistically insignificantdifference between skeletal Class I group and skeletal Class II group.Conclusion: The hyoid position of Class II adolescence patients was comparatively behind compared Class I adolescence patients horizontally, but there was no obviousdifference vertically. | | Keywords/Search Tags: | Skeletal Class II, Skeletal Class I, adolescence patients, Hyoid position, CBCT | PDF Full Text Request | Related items |
| |
|