Peabody And Gesell Scales Evaluating The Effect Of Conductive Education Early Intervene On HIE Infants And Correlation Analysis Between Two Scales

Objective:To observe the effect of conductive education(CE) early intervention on infants with moderate HIE, compare two different results which evaluated by Peabody developmental motor scales 2 and Gesell scales, and analyzed the correlation of them.Methods:106 cases HIE infants within 1-3 months were divided into two groups. A. control group(n=51, 28 cases were boys, 23 cases were girls) was applied by routine rehabilitation intervene measures. B. observation group(n =55, 22 cases were boys, 33 cases were girls): On the base of routine rehabilitation intervene measures, CE early intervention was added to apply. At the age of 11 months, we evaluated the development state with Gesell scale and PDMS-2.Results:The results of evaluated by PDMS-2 showed that the normal cases of observation group(51/55)was significant higher than that of control group(40/51), P<0.05. The results of evaluated by Gesell scales showed that the normal cases of observation group(50/55)was significant higher than that of control group(39/51),P<0.05. Which both improved that the effect of routine rehabilitation intervene adding CE intervene was more effective than that of pure routine rehabilitation intervene. And the total quotient /DQ of PDMS-2 and Gesell scales are very closely, which show high correlation(r=0.928).The correlation coefficient of Gross Motor quotient was the greatest(r=0.941)while that of Fine Motor quotient was lower slightly. The routine rehabilitation intervene meastures added to CE early intervention was more effective on infants with HIE. There were significant correlations between the PDMS-2 and Gesell scales, especially in the Gross Motor.Conclusions:The routine rehabilitation intervene measures added to CE early intervention was more effective on infants with HIE. There were significant correlations between the PDMS-2 and Gesell scales, especially in the Gross Motor.