Based On The "Tiangui Theory" From The Microcosmic Syndrome Differentiation Use Of "Recuperating Menstruation By Conditioning Tiangui" To Observe The Clinical Curative Effect Of The Treatment Of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Objectives:Based on the evaluation of "Tiangui theory" from the microcosmic syndrome differentiation through the method of using "recuperate menstruation by conditioning Tiangui" treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome with safety, effectiveness of traditional Chinese medicine; perfect the "Tiangui theory", TCM microcosmic syndrome differentiation system in the gynecology of traditional Chinese medicine.Methods:In strict accordance with the inclusion criteria to select patients, according to research programs will be incorporated into the cases into treatment Ⅰ, Ⅱ treatment group and the control group I, group II, treatment group were treated with "recuperate menstruation by conditioning Tiangui", the control group of Western medicine Diane-35 treatment, clinical treatment cycle is three months, three months follow-up observation, collection of clinical data, fill out reports, statistical analysis and objective the evaluation.Results:(1) Test total effective rate was 75.0%, the treatment group was 75.0%, 75.0% in the control group, no significant difference, P>0.05 was not statistically significant.(2) Test group Ⅰ, there was the efficiency of the treatment group compared with the control group significant difference, P<0.05 was statistically significant; and effective, there was no significant difference in efficiency as compared to the two groups, P>0.05 was not statistically significance. Test group II in the treatment group compared with the control group was efficient, effective, efficient and no significant difference in total, P>0.05 was not statistically significant.(3) During follow-up treatment and control groups ovulation comparison, there was no significant difference between the groups before February 2, P> 0.05 was not statistically significant, there was a significant difference in the first March ovulation test groups with control group, P<0.05, with statistical significance.(4) Test group I, the treatment group before and after treatment comparison LH significantly decreased, P<0.05 statistically significant in the control group of their own comparison, and compared to each other, there was no significant difference, P>0.05 was not statistically significant; experimental group II, and before and after treatment comparison and contrast LH itself was no significant difference in each other, P>0.05 was not statistically significant.(5) Test group I, before and after treatment, and the treatment group after treatment after treatment compared with the control group, LH/FSH significantly decreased, P<0.05 was statistically significant; there was no significant change in the control group, P>0.05 was not statistically significant. Ⅱ in the test group, before and after treatment comparison and contrast their own LH/FSH was no significant difference in each other, P>0.05 was not statistically significant.(6) Test group Ⅰ, before and after treatment comparison and contrast with each other their own T values were not significantly different, P>0.05 was not statistically significant. Ⅱ test group, the treatment group before and after treatment T was no significant difference, P>0.05 was not statistically significant; while in the control group comparison itself, as well as the treatment group and contrast, T values after treatment were significantly lower, P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.(7) Test group Ⅰ, the treatment group before and after treatment comparison, and post-treatment comparison group symptom scores were significantly lower, P<0.05 was statistically significant; comparing themselves no significant difference in the control group, P>0.05 is not statistically significant. Ⅱ in the test group, before and after treatment comparison of symptom scores themselves were significantly different, P<0.05 was statistically significant; and contrast the two groups but no significant difference after treatment, P>0.05 was not statistically significant.(8) In the test group Ⅱ before and after treatment, comparing itself mean FG hirsutism score was no significant difference, P>0.05 was not statistically significant; in the control group of their own comparison, and after treatment between two groups were significantly different, P<0.05 considered statistically significant.conclusions:Based on the evaluation of "Tiangui theory" from the microcosmic syndrome differentiation through the method of using "recuperating menstruation by conditioning Tiangui" treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome with safety and effectiveness;However,depending on the clinical syndromes, there were specific differences in the clinical efficacy, Therefore in modern clinical treatment process should pay attention combined with modern medical testing indicators, using microscopic dialectical thinking, so that the combination of disease and syndrome differentiation, this method is worthy of further investigation, and then extended clinic.