"The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution Literature" Media Research

“The cultural revolution literature” is the social, cultural, political and historical product of force under the distortional action of multiple factors; especially performance is closely related to politics, or even a political tool. In the era of drastic changes and political norms confine. “The cultural revolution literature” has times brand; “The cultural revolution” under the effect of psychological functions of war has always been billed as of literature and art to develop “proletarian heroes” as the basic task of literature and art. Which always highlight a strong political ideology coerced arts policy and adheres to the “three prominent” creative principle. “The cultural revolution” always flaunt the mainstream discourse “grand narrative” collectivization creation and folk discourse thin recessive personalized creative personality. Besides, “the cultural revolution” power—holders rely on state power to publish all the scrutiny and regulation institutions and transmission way. A great number of literary journals suspension, a variety of distribution channels and media were restrictions or control, literature communication becomes difficult. Even the so—called “carnival of literature”, also is constructed in such bad literature and literary ecological environment, highlights the political false Muppets like grief fate. Therefore, the article is based on the principle of symbiotic interaction between literature and media. “The cultural revolution literature” media studies from the three dimensions of the full spread. Regard the theory of media as the breakthrough point of view. Explore the historical context of how “the cultural revolution” period of absence of the literary journal “cultural revolution literature” to become possible. At the same time, from both diachronic and synchronic dimension, detailed analyzes how “the cultural revolution literature” discourse produces and transmits. Fully reveal the deep relations between the symbiotic interaction between literature and media, reveal the hidden burial literature field of complex ideological struggle. Finally, in simple language summarize the “cultural revolution literature” with the media as well as the relationship between ideological theories. Hoping to through the above—mentioned, the “cultural revolution literature” is injected new vitality and fresh blood, only to throw out a minnow to catch a whale.