Thesis Of Bottom-class Novels

With more and more Bottom-class problems coming, there are more and more concentrations on Bottom-class which leading to a trend of Bottom-class narration. Writers put there eyes on the Bottom-class, they write the miserable life and living problems of Bottom-class and describe the difficult environment of Bottom-class. Labor literature writers describe the life of Bottom-class and labor literature attracts much attention. Bottom-class novel has its own meaning and worth, but there are still many problems in the statements of Bottom-class. For examples, whether writers can represent the Bottom-class and whether Bottom-class novel can go out of the misunderstanding on sympathy.Trend on Bottom-class narration in literature also affects the preferences of films, many novels are adapted by films which becoming a new cultural phenomenon. The readers of Bottom-class novels are not coming from the Bottom-class, they have sympathy on the Bottom-class and satisfaction after reading the novels that makes Bottom-class novels full of secular affinity. Bottom-class novels emerges in the market age, consumer aesthetics of consumer society and the change of writing system affect the aesthetic and writing principle which leading to writers writer for the market. Readers’ reception and writing skills for the market have meeting point with films adaption, more and more novels are adapted by films.Films adapt novels and try to describe one kind of new Bottom-class narration. Using the film’s view to look at the referring novels and find that Bottom-class novels and adapted films have some common problems. Writers and directors have wrong understanding and unrealistic thinking on the Bottom-class, they stand on the standpoint of morality and feeling to write the misery of Bottom-class which leading to a mode of writing misery for misery. Lacking the experience of Bottom-class between writers and directors leads to the bias in the understanding of Bottom-class that makes them have exceeding sympathy and unrealistic imagination. Writers and directors want to find a way of solving problems for the Bottom-class and sometimes their narration lacks a right logic. Standing on the surface of describing the living environment can’t rise to the height of investigating humanity.Writers and directors treat Bottom-class problems as moral problems. Bottom-class Narration is commercial and interesting which makes novels can’t reflect the real feelings of writers’, it just narrates daily life of Bottom-class. Writing for the need of market, Bottom-class Narration loose the ability to inquire the heart of Bottom-class and also loose its noble literature character. Bottom-class Narration needs to remove elite consciousness of writers for Bottom-class under the control of elite words is not true and person of Bottom-class has the character of clerisy and can’t represent real Bottom-class. When Bottom-class Narration becomes a writing fun of interest, writers show laugh and contempt to Bottom-class. Writer must have a courage and intuitive knowledge to grub the truth of history and break the gulf between writers and Bottom-class. By writing how the Bottom-class face the misery and life to show their thinking and struggling to fate and that is what should literature does. Writers write Bottom-class, they not only need show sympathy and concern to them but also have a spirit of undertaking responsibility for the society and conscious which need article ability and intuitive knowledge.