Aesthetic And Historical Practice

The Concept of "Tathandlung" of Lukacs plays an important theoretical role in History and Class Consciousness. However, there are many deficiencies in the domestic academic researching on Lukacs "Tathandlung" concept. Most scholars interpret the meaning of "Tathandlung" concept from the perspective of the Hegel dialectic. These studies are not fully aware of the positive impact of Fichte’s philosophy on the meaning of "Tathandlung" concept. The innovation of this article is beyond domestic scholars from Hegel to interpret the idea of Lukacs. Specialized research the Fichte positive impaction on young Lukacs "Tathandlung" concept. Lukacs is based on action and how to develop a philosophy of Fichte’s practical philosophy with Marxism implication-the historical practice and purpose.This article first traces the young Lukacs "Tathandlung" concept of the theoretical background. "Tathandlung" concept is mainly for Kant freedom and the inevitable conflict issues raised To solve the problem of freedom and the inevitable conflict issues, Lukacs mainly illustrates it from the aesthetic and historical connotations. The similarities of the concept of Tathandlung of Lukacs and Fichte is aesthetic. Aesthetic activity resists the erosion of capitalist ideology and criticizes the second international positivist worldview and advocates the creativity of subject and the equality between the subject. When the action has a strong artistic aesthetic connotation, its romantic colour is more intense. The creation of the concept of "Tathandlung" of Lukacs is historic. Historic contains a strong subjectivity, in other words, Tathandlung revolves around the concept of historical self-consciousness to expand. History is class consciousness. Unfortunately, his "Tathandlung" concept of historical exposition just stay at the level of theory, the lack of capitalist critique of political economy, which has strong romantic tendencies, and ultimately to the utopianism. Lukacs’s Tathandlung concept also emphasizes the revolutionary and critical, but his "Tathandlung" is limited to the revolutionary and critical aesthetic and artistic fields. Marx’s concept of practice only truly revolutionary, critical significance. Marx’s concept of practice has emerged from outside the philosophy of capitalism critique, deep into the realm of production in capitalist society, the capitalist mode of production a scientific anatomy.