| With the rapid development of society, the gradual diversification of the value and theexcessive pursuit of individualism has made the tradition social ethics of the material wealthsociety retreat gradually. Non-Salvation-in-Danger act of the person of no specific obligationin face of others’ dangerous adjusted by ethics has lost the moral control in the background ofsociety.Facing to the flooding of Non-Salvation-in-Danger,we only can seek forlegal.However, the relationship between morality and law has always been the mostcontroversialtopic.So the legalization of moral obligation of no specific obligation personmust be treated with caution.Incriminating Non-Salvation-in-Danger is people’s needs ofsocial security and protect of human rights.As a society should bear the socialresponsibility.Of course incriminating Non-Salvation-in-Danger is not the emotional behaviorof the impulse, because it is reasonable. On the one hand, the legalization ofNon-Salvation-in-Danger act throughout the ancient legislation, while abroad, there are manyrelevant legislation provides us with legislative experience; the other hand, incriminatingNon-Salvation-in-Danger do not violate criminal law modesty and also has the legitimacy ofcriminal law..Therefore,incriminating Non-Salvation-in-Danger.Therefore, for making thecriminalization of Non-Salvation-in-Dangeron more reasonable and practical, the discussionof this crime can’t stay in a theoretical basis, we should combine with the specificconditions,design the specific system and define constitution of the crime. |
