A Study On Internet Privacy Protection Mode

The exposure of Cookie’s divulging privacy at CCTV315Party,2013havemade the protection of online privacy come into the eyesight of public again whichbecomes the present hot topic. Actually, from the incident of Chen Zhiyao’s fleshsearch in2001, the protection of online privacy is interrogated by people continually.The author has made a summary; there are29incidents about the violating of onlineprivacy right from2001to2014.With the coming of online technology age, we chat online, trace all kinds ofinformation domestically and abroad and as if we can’t live without internet. When itcomes to China’s participation of WTO, the economic communities of countries hasconstantly enhanced, E-commerce has advanced briskly which becomes the vital partof national economy. As a result, the country’s financial boom is inseparable frominternet technology as well. But whether it is in China or in foreign countries, nomatter it is the incident of flesh search or Cookie’s divulging privacy, that shows theserious scarcity of people’s online privacy protection consciousness and there is asevere flaw of national internet privacy protection pattern which must be improved.This paper analyzes and researches our country’s internet privacy protectionand takes advantage of foreign advanced experience in order that it can help toconstruct internet privacy protection pattern of our country. There are four parts inthis paper.The first part mainly analyzes internet privacy right judicially, and investigatethe privacy and privacy right, then research the concept of internet privacy right andparticularity of right violation deeply.The second part analyzes its shortcomings and existing problems throughresearch present situation of our nation’s legislative rules and business self-regulation about protection of internet privacy.The third part mainly makes a comparative analysis on the protection patternof developed country. It takes the legislative rule pattern of EU, American businessself-regulation pattern, the connection of national legislation and businessself-regulation of Japanese protection pattern, Korean named internet system andCanadian technological protection pattern for example, and lists their advantages anddisadvantages.The last parts gives some suggestions to the choice and construction of ourcountry’s internet privacy protection right and analyzes their feasibilities so as tofigure out the best ways. Through the former analysis and investigation, we shouldadopt the protection of “legislation is the main way and business self-regulation isthe secondary way”. With the prerequisite of completing present laws andregulations, the government ought to give legislation to internet privacy right anduse Punitive Damages mechanism, enhance business self-regulation. What’s more,the public’s law consciousness should be improved, set up government internetprivacy right authentication organization and make Chinese government internetprivacy authentication plan on the basis of sufficient considering our country’sconditions.