Study On The Right Protection Of Households To Be Resettled On State Owned Land

“The houses on State-owned land expropriation and compensation regulation” isimposed by the public service established in principle, the commercial developmentcan be excluded from the scope of executive powers to intervene, effectivelyalleviate the social conflicts due to be levied on commercial development triggered"Urban Housing Demolition Ordinance". Meanwhile, the regulations imposed on thelevy to redefine the nature and behavior of the parties, replaced by judicialenforcement of administrative enforcement, so levied behavior toward legalization,in terms of protecting the legitimate rights and interests are charged one also has anew progress. But excessive regulation framework, provides for the principle, in theprocess of making the practical application of effect is not obvious. Enforce justicewas generally considered to represent a major advance in the new regulation, duringspecific operations are also facing severe tests. While these problems exist,ultimately points to a violation was levy’s legal rights. Is imposed by the protectionof the human rights situation? What protection exists on the plight? What are thecauses of these difficulties have? How to improve on these issues, realize the goal ofsafeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of expropriated persons?This article is intended to levy on houses on State-owned land is exploring thequestion of human rights protection, by contrast to the urban housing unitsOrdinance and the State-owned housing on land expropriation and CompensationOrdinance is levied on substantive rights, the evolution of procedural rights, at thesame time learn from foreign countries (regions) is levied in the protection of humanrights and specific provisions, perfecting the housing rights of the expropriatedperson the protection system proposed concrete measures.