Qualitative Research Of Theft Of The Network Virtual Property

With the development of science and technology and progress,the network virtualproperty shows more and more important role in people’s life.At the same time, violations ofnetwork virtual property are increasingly rampant,as the main means to steal,which hurtserious the legitimate rights and interests of network virtual property. As china’s criminal lawdoes not specify whether the network virtual property belongs to the significance of criminallaw in our country’s public and private property,how to regulate the act of stealing fictitiousproperty,which lead to the emergence of many disputes and differences in the theory and thejudicial practice.Because,the determination of the legal status of network virtual property andqualitative analysis of stealing network virtual property are the need of development of era.Ianalyse the case、its focus and dispute,the legal status of network virtual property,thequalitative behaviour of stealing network virtual property,network virtual property theftamount determination,with a real case as the breakthrough point.In addition to the introduction,the thesis has five parts,20000words approximately.The first part is cause of the case.Namely Zhang stealing case.The second part is the fact of the case. The criminal group to Zhang as the main criminalstole the network virtual property of Jiuyou coins,lianzhong coins and Warcraft point,thevalue of292715.2yuan.Chongqing Jiulongpo District Court a theft.The third part is the focus of the case.Whether the network virtual property belongs tothe significance of criminal law in our country ’s public and private property? Whether the actof stealing virtual network property is theft in criminal law of our country? Determination ofthe amount of stealing virtual network property.The fourth part is controversy and disagreement.This decision caused widespreadcontroversy,the pros and cons are existing at the same time.The prosecution and defense holddifferent opinions about Whether the network virtual property belongs to our country criminallaw protection of property,whether the act of stealing fictitious property for our traditionaltheft be regulated,the problem of stealing the network virtual property amount determination.The fifth part is the legal analysis.I put forward own views through the comparison andanalysis of relevant theories on appeal three points of controversy and judicial practice to deal with the situation.I think the network virtual property belongs to the criminal law of ourcountry’s public and private property,the act of stealing the network virtual property shouldapply to our traditional theft to regulate,an authoritative network virtual property assessmentagencies for the network virtual property theft amount is determined should be set up.The sixth part is the conclusion.Through the analysis on the part of legal theory, combined with thecase of disputes, draws the following conclusion:Jiuyou coins,lianzhong coins and Warcraft pointbelong to the significance of criminal law in China ’s public and private property;The suspect theft aboutJiuyou coins,lianzhong coins and Warcraft point should apply to our traditional theft toregulate;Jiuyou coins,lianzhong coins and Warcraft poin are the network virtual property clear pricing,the theft was identified as292715.2yuan.