| There are many reasons of the administrative monopoly, including economic motives, legal reasons, system causes and even cultural incentives. The repeated administrative monopoly does harm to serious damage to the economic development, market order, the image of the government, and the interests of enterprises and consumers. The governance of administrative monopoly has always been a top priority of antitrust laws, but the actual effect is not ideal. This article hopes to find the bottleneck of the governance of administrative monopoly, and puts forward reasonable proposals for the effective management of administrative monopoly. Combing the process of anti-administrative monopoly, I find that the overall trend is from fragmentation to integration. Thus, the integration of research draws on different disciplines such as economics, law, summarize a number of systems breaking, reveal the realistic governance difficulties, and recognize that the fundamental crux of governance lies with the uneven force of government and civil society. Apparently, in order to find a way for the anti-administrative monopoly, perfection or adjustment of the relevant department law alone is not enough. We need to build one anti-administrative monopoly system ladder from the anti-monopoly law to the relevant administrative law further to organic extension of the constitutional regime, carrying on the multi-level, full range of governance. |