The Standard Research Of Intellectual Property Judicial Authentication

Today, as we know, technology trade has a vigorous development in the world, which makes intellectual property to be an important strategy in companies and countries because of its enormous economic benefits. As one of the most important evidences, intellectual property judicial authentication opinions naturally become the focus in the intellectual property litigation, its fairness, legitimacy can not only support the trial, but also has an impact for the system of the intellectual property judicial authentication. In China, intellectual property judicial authentication is not that mature, for a long time, there have been some problems in it, Like the concept of intellectual property judicial authentication haven’t unified, it is also short of supervision because there have no benign connect between administrative management and industry management. And the right to start the identification is vague, which may hurt the procedure`s fairness and litigant`s rights and interests. At the same time, its authority and development are weakened because it has not yet brought into unified judicial appraisal management, and existing jurisdiction transfer phenomenon and so on. In addition, insufficient theoretical research makes conflicts between the laws and the practice, even worse, this situation dented the credibility of the intellectual property judicial authentication. So it is urgent to find out solutions. How to deal with these problems? We think we can benefit from foreign intellectual property judicial authentication and other kinds of judicial identification, increasing investment in scientific research to increase its reliability and promote Chinese judicial identification.