The Government Regulation Of Wechat Speech

As the developme nt of economic glo baliza tio n and the populariza tio n of interne t applic atio n, increa singly amount of inter net- based communic at ion platfo rm have emerged,and WeC hat is one of them. WeC hat was promot ed in 2011, and un til to January 2015, the to tal numb er of its users gr ows to 600 milli o n. WeC hat ha s influe nce on a wide range of gr oups, i ts rapid develo pment shows that powerful vitalit y is a new thing which has a positive signific ance on the prosperit y of the socialis t market economy and the developme nt of freedom of speech.How ever, WeC hat still needs perfect ion, especia lly for the solut ions of the le gal problems. S uch as abusing the right of freedom of speech, the prevale nce o f fals e stat ement s, ma lic ious slander, infr ingeme nt of intelle c tual propert y, pornographic speech that destr oyed public order and good moral, even more, there some remar ks whic h endanger the nationa l securit y, and have produced some bad result to the societ y. Rese arch on WeC hat has big impor tan ce to promot ing the develo pment of WeC hat and to protect ing the freedom of speech on inst ant communic atio n tools.T he aut hor advocates balanced theory to finis h this resear ch. This theory seeks to weigh the specific relat ions hip betw een rights and obligat ions, and to promot es the developme nt of power into a cont radic tio n. In this case, b y grasping point highlight s of the conflic t of inter est, balanced the ory emphasiz ed the balance of the fundament al right s o f citize ns freedom o f speech and the nat ional adminis t rative power, which form ed a dynamic balance betw een the right s of natio nal right s and freedom of speech.In additio n to this, in order to achieve the realiza t ion of common int eres ts and solve the disput es, we should str engthen the public partic ipat ion and emphasis its role as the constit ut ional guarante e.To solve the le gal problems, we can star t from the follo wing steps : fir st, to guarante e the rights of freedom of speech on WeC hat cons tit utio na lly, as w ell as to limit scope o f freedom of speech o n WeC hat. F or examp le, to ensure that the c onte nt of WeC hat speech must be true and le gal, it must not infringe others ’ legit ima te right s and inter est s, and it must not har m nationa l securit y or public intere sts. S econdly,according to differ ent types of micr o lett er to distinguis h speech processing. If the public stateme nts o n WeC hat involve polit ical speech, we should be cautious to avoid the mis leading adverse public opinion s. WeC hat user should take the obligat ion ofprelimi na ry review and prevent the spread of malic ious remar ks when he reproduc ing and shar ing others speech. T he right of freedom of speech o n WeC hat must give way to the vit al inter ests o f the government. F inally, we need stre ngthen the supervis ion of the government through the follo w ing specific measur es, such as establis hing the mechanis m of WeC hat cens orship, adher ing to the WeC hat background real- name syste m, etc.