Study On Selective Enforcement And Its Supervision

With nomocracy in our country continue to move forward, the public is also growing awareness of nomocracy. And law enforcement agencies requirements are also rising. The exposure amplification of selective enforcement through the network, microblogging result in very adverse social impact on the credibility of law enforcement agencies, and also cause damage. Although selective enforcement under certain circumstances are reasonable, such as through a flexible enforcement point to face, saving the limited enforcement resources and enforcement costs, etc., it brings the problem is multifaceted.As contrary to nomocracy, it violates the law enforcement body the right to equality, breaks the order value demands, damages the body’s legal and law enforcement authority. It is not conducive to the establishment of rule of faith and so on. As no cure corruption, selective enforcement may not be able to fundamentally eliminate, such as the above-mentioned drawbacks but that selective enforcement should be limited, as far as possible to reduce and avoid the emergence of selective enforcement. Therefore, we must selectively through multiple means to strengthen the supervision of law enforcement, including the strengthening of nomocracy to lay the social foundation, improve our basic system of administrative supervision, including strengthening public administration, security supervision by public opinion, deepen People’s Congress, the supervisory role of administrative proceedings, establish a reliable external supervision system, and the implementation of specific measures to further reduce the selective enforcement of the space, and their integration into a reasonable range of discretion...