Amnesty —From The "Righteous Fight" To "the Public As A Private"

Involved in the follow-up observations of Lu in the mountain village of mud clearing a four-year government amnesty peasant rights movement and the new elite. This is a tug of war between the old and new elites. In this tug of war, the new elite in material wealth, social relations, and so on almost all aspects of personal ability, than the old elite are in a weak, but quickly focus from the power control of the entire village, insist on fighting for four years years. The internal factors support the struggle of the villagers is "righteousness" of desire. And this desire is based on clear mud ditch superior agricultural conditions established on the basis of more developed on the basis of Confucian civilization. I put this fight is called the "righteous fight" and this desire for justice is not "altruism" but a "private to the public as" the concept of this contradiction requires us to the inner meaning of the public’s in-depth discussion. In the political field, "public" is still defined as a contract theory premised on "public" but this commonality is being challenged from all sides. The farmer behavior logic to "public" as private as we question the meaning provided a unique perspective. This "a well as private" is based on the relationship based on the Confucian. Because the relationship between Confucian civilization advocated natural material wealth than the more public nature. Long-standing conflict between the "relationship-based" and people Confucian civilization as animal instinct "material standard" is the above-mentioned contradiction and ambiguity kernel. And this is precisely the conflict leads us to think "public" excellent perspective of the concept. The social productivity to meet the degree of material wealth is this ambiguity deepest background. When the social productive forces to meet the demand for material wealth, the relationship between the standard Confucian civilization, you can dominate. On the contrary, it is the dominant standard substance. Today, with the help of technology, the highly developed social productivity, great to meet the people’s demand for material wealth, which provides excellent conditions for the establishment of a "public to private" behavior logic, the community also need this "to public to private "behavior logic. And the role of ideas in the process of human change and the government can not be ignored in. From the cases we find that local governments for the "righteous struggle," the new elite bears the ultimate failure of an extremely important responsibility. And this failure to clear mud ditch some of the villagers "to the public for private" thinking miss was another heavy blow.