Study On The Establishing Identify Of Video Images

In recent years, with the construction of “peace Chinese” and “Skynet project” and otherlarge-scale security projects, the country’s major cities and even in public places, towns,enterprises, institutions and even individuals for various purposes based on electronicmonitoring equipment installed more coverage to the larger, more densely packed. Thismakes the situation of cases could be monitored in a timely manner through the device, anobjective to capture, and ways to become an important basis for the investigating authoritiesfound instant crime, lock the suspect, rebuild the site, determine the facts, to carry out a stringand an important basis and means the case. However, in the investigation of the practice,more and more suspects deny the recorded video surveillance of people like himself, leadingto the probative force of video data in an indeterminate state or declined. In order to expandthe video “proof of application” for the content of the video image information judge depthanalysis, carry out in the same identified specific video portraits and things like becoming ahot issue in the field of forensic audio and video data.This paper attempts to identify the video images of the same conduct researchframework. Video images from the same theoretical study finds departure, the same depthstudy finds its uniqueness. The use of the aforementioned theory to guide practice, combinedwith the practice of actual cases related to investigate specific methods to carry out the samedetermination. Discusses how to use the identity of the body found on a video image ofthinking deeply integrated judgment, which found that the specific difficulties faced inpractice. In order to promote the video image in the investigation and identificationapplications, advancing the theory and practice of benefit levels.This paper is divided into four parts;The first part is an overview of the video images of the same authorization. Introducedthe concepts of the video finds the same question, the specific range that contains the object.Compared with the traditional analysis of the physical evidence found in the same videoimages of the same features found itself. Meanwhile, the same one found in the identificationand forensic investigators to distinguish between video and discussion.The second part is to demonstrate the scientific basis of the theoretical level from videoimages of the same conduct identified. Explaining its basis and the specific conditions for implementation, aimed to answer two basic questions: Why the video image of the sameidentified scientific? How to identify the video images of the same in order to reflect itsscientific.The third part is the practice to carry out the same video and identified according tospecific methods used to elaborate. For the test, and other aspects of comprehensivejudgments with specific case analysis to identify the object from feature to feature recognitionmethod.The fourth stage is to identify the main difficulties of video images of the same face toelaborate. From the ambiguity of the image, professional personnel training, specializedidentification software technology research and development, improve relevant laws andregulations and other aspects of the video images of the same identified specific problemsfacing deep analysis.