Font Size: a A A

Research Settings Questions Of Our Judicial District

Posted on:2016-04-27Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:K L ZhangFull Text:PDF
GTID:2296330467993312Subject:Law
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
With the continuous improvement of the legal establishment and society civic awareness of China’s socialist market economic system, the sharp rise in cases of judicial proceedings, so that the shortcomings of the existing set of jurisdictions have become increasingly prominent, the current management of the implementation of the Court of Justice to form a localized phenomenon. In order to make the management of China’s socialist judicial system more fair, efficient and authoritative, we urgently need to reset an entire jurisdiction. On the overall this paper’s structure divided into four parts.The first part of the concept of judicial jurisdiction to define and distinguish the relevant concepts, emphasizing this article to a people’s court to exercise jurisdiction as the powers of the body, laying the groundwork for the demonstration view below.The second part describes China has established four levels of courts at present and their respective characteristics and implied that can’t solve the problem, namely the place of justice, judicial corruption, and so on.The third section mainly uses the comparative research method to describe the basic information and practical experience in Britain, the United States Court Organization, Germany, Japan, France and the representative for the state, appointment and removal of payment systems and financial management and other aspects of the system, and analyzes their advantages and shortcomings, draw the appropriate conclusion that the circumstances in which the case is consistent with what is inconsistent with the administrative and political subdivision, which helps to provide a favorable jurisdiction of judicial reform set.The fourth part focuses on the idea of setting jurisdictions.Mainly from the Third Plenum of the Party’s eighteen, social background report on reform Fourth Plenary Session of the proposed decision, analyzes the meaning and standards of the current jurisdictions reset, learn some foreign court management, combined with China the basic conditions, to make some constructive program of judicial jurisdiction set to effectively address the jurisdiction of our courts to establish, appointment, removal and monitoring mechanisms, financial security mechanisms and other issues, in order to avoid interference of local protectionism, achieve justice, safeguard the unity of the state legal system.
Keywords/Search Tags:Judicial district, localization of justice, justice, reform
PDF Full Text Request
Related items