Dual-dimension Research On Marxist Historical Judgments In The View Of Ordinal Form

In the opinion of the Marxist historical materialism, there being two dimensions of the judgments, one is historical trending which means the development of the productivity while the other is the human liberation. The two different paths have different inspection points.In the opinion of the Marxist historical materialism, the historical progress does not only emphasize the productive-dominated human society development is some kind of natural history progress, but also underline the human liberation in other words the conscious activity (class struggle) is also vital to the historical progress. They are dialectical unity. However, it seems that in the classic works of the Marx’s and Engels’s, there are some historical judgments appear like contradict.There are some judgments those Marx just made from the ethical view, which can not mean that Marx believed there being a need to maintain the so called fair to sacrificed the development of the productive force, otherwise, development of the productive force also can not based on the theory of the expropriation is justice. Sometime we misunderstand Marx’s famous conclusion, admitting the fact’s existing doesn’t means agreeing with. We admit that fact the history’s progress made through the exploitation (some degree from the historical view, not absolutely), otherwise there being no need for Marx to support the class struggle and "two must".We could get contradict conclusion from different class position for using the traditional dual-standard judgment for value judgment feathered with class-oriented constituent. All the puzzles those formed under the common tense, which would disappear under the calendar tense.There are two basic value dimensions, one is the liberty of the human being and the revolution of productivity, which are dialectical unity. So in practice, the reality asks us not only focus on the building of economy, but also the overall development of the people’s life. However the two dimensions cannot be developed neck by neck at the same time. In the different stages of the history of the human society, the key point can switch from the liberty of the human being to the revolution of productivity.From the whole picture, liberty of the human being and the revolution of productivity are dialectical unity. We could get dynamic balance. Those conclusions we mentioned could help us solve the judgment which seemed contradict.In practical, in the first stage of the reform, we need to develop the productive force greatly, which means we pay more attention to the development of the productivity. In the open part of the reform, dealing with all those problems appeared in the first stage is very important, meanwhile we concern both the judgment trending.In the deep part of the reform we would show solicitude for the integrated development of the people, that’s the main point.