Two Ways Of Reconstructing The Relationship Of "Marx- Hegel"

The orientation about the relationship of "Marx-Hegel", involving both about the Hegel’s source of Marx’s thought, and relate to how to understand Marx’s philosophy revolution. In the discussion of the relationship of "Marx-Hegel", the true relationship of Marx and Hegel has also been covered in the construction of many interpreters. To return to Marx’s text, carefully combs the theory clues of five criticism of Marx to Hegel,restore the real process of collision between Marx and Hegel’s thought,we found that, Marx realized the inheritance and transformation of Hegel’s concept dialectics, along with the deepening of economic research. Applies historical dialectics to the critique of capitalist society, Marx perspective the internal mechanism of capitalist mode of production and the historical destiny of capitalism scientifically.At present academia mainly exist in the following four kinds of theory models of understanding the relationship of "Marx-Hegel", one is the theory of inheritance represented in Eugen, Lukacs and Marcuse; the other is the theory of reverse represented by Engels, Lenin and Merlin; the third is the Norman Levin, Tom Rockman and Carver as representatives of the anti-Engels theory; the forth is Coletti, Althusser and Negri represented in the theory of fracture or rejection. Among them, Althusser and Negri belong to campaign against Hegel’s dialectics, but their historical origin, methodology and concrete ideas are very different.The produce of any kind of ideological trend is not imagined, Althusser and Negri are not exceptional. From the historical background, Althusser’s thought responds to the two big time problems after 20 th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, which aims to the in-depth criticism of dogmatic Marxism and the humanism of Marxism; Negri responds to the Italian independent movement. From the ideological background, Althusser is deeply influenced by French science epistemology tradition and the structuralism, and the thought of post structuralism anti-dialectic influences Negri profoundly. According to the idea of different context, Althusser and Negri respectively establish the structuralism methodology and methodological path of constitutive ontology. Thus, in view of the idea of "Marx and Hegel" relationship, Althusser and Negri has a different interpretation. On the interpretation of Hegel’s dialectics, Althusser asserts that Marx not only replaces the one dimension decision paradox of Hegel with the multiple decisions on contradiction theory, but substitutes the original simple unity for the existing structure of the complex whole; Negri argues that Marx replaces the dialectical logic with the logical confrontation of labor and capital, refusing to eliminate contradictions. In terms of Marx’s historical thoughts, Althusser declares that history is a process without subject; Negri claims that history is a dynamic and open process which is based on the creative power of subject.At this point, Althusser and Negri were completed to reshaping the relationship of "Marx-Hegel". Whether it is for the purpose to defend marxism scientific or reshape marxism revolutionary, they have refused to acknowledge that the dialectics relationship Marx associated with Hegel’s, deviated from the true idea of Marx to some extent. Although Althusser opposed humanitarian, but he constructed the Marx doctrine of scientism with the same the Marx doctrine of humanitarian, both have deviated from the starting from the individual of reality of historical materialism. His decision paid too much emphasis on the structure function and the objectivity of historical development,will go to the path of neglecting the working-class motility, to make Marxism become a kind of empirical research and lost its critical and revolutionary. Negri always swing between materialism and voluntarism, both in theoretical completely eliminate the linear skopos theory logic of historical process to complete uncertainty of historical development and openness, and want to provide sufficient condition of reality of the working class plenty of subjectivity and the realization of communism, finally to the utopia of the revolution.