Research On The Anti-monopoly Rule Of Trade Association Information Exchange

Market economy is the information society, trade associations, as operators of the Commonwealth, its function can play repository to collect and use this information-oriented industry operators to provide production, management, marketing on the convenience. However, the information exchange process had to face a number of problems that may occur as a result the price cartel, the price of alliance and other restricting competition. Our limited to existing laws and regulations for the industry associations information exchange behavior is not specific provisions for such cases and abroad have similar statutes and jurisprudence, etc. for reference.In addition to the introduction of writing paper describes the background, beyond the significance of domestic and international literature review, research methods, the main part of the paper is divided into four. Chapter 2 describes the paper industry associations define functions to define the behavior of the exchange of information on trade associations, forms a detailed analysis.Secondly, the paper points out the theoretical basis for industry associations information exchange and borders. This section is to demonstrate the theoretical basis for the exchange of information Industry Association Antitrust Regulation were club theory, industry associations failure theory. Meanwhile, also on the trade associations to exchange information Antitrust Regulation of the border, made a theoretical discussion,pointed out industry associations to exchange information by national industrial policies,the content of some of the country’s economic interests and security have a beneficial effect, It is not subject to antitrust regulation.Again, the thesis Chapter 4 Antitrust Regulation experience exchange of information on foreign trade association in behavior were introduced. In the United States, Germany and Japan representative, for example, introduced the anti-monopoly legislation of the three national trade association information exchange, information exchange antitrust enforcement and information exchange antitrust some systems of justice, in favor of the existing industry Association information exchange antitrust legislation, law enforcement and judicial reference and perfect.At the same time, the paper points out the analysis of the behavior of industry associations information exchange antitrust regulations existing problems and deficiencies. Mainly pointed out industry associations to exchange information on thebasis of the behavior of the lack of specific legislation, there is the difficulty of law enforcement, the lack of a clear judicial relief, and with the Shanghai Gold Jewelry Industry Association Antitrust Case of regulation, particularly pointed out in the legislative, judicial, our responsibility industry associations information exchange behavior legal regulations currently exist in terms of many of the deficiencies and inadequate.Finally, the trade association for the flaws and shortcomings of information exchange behavior antitrust regulations that exist in the system design for the corresponding refined and improved. Mainly to our country at the legislative level, a clear definition of exemptions and leniency Industry Association Information Elements exchanged monopolistic behavior, as well as industry associations information exchange behavior. Identification industry associations to exchange information specific form of monopolistic behavior, establish trade associations to exchange information Illegality recognized standards, improve information exchange functions of trade associations conduct regulatory authorities, and the establishment of the Subject Information Industry Association for Information Interchange bear behavior legal liability.