Cross Regional Jurisdiction System Administrative Cases

Jurisdiction many difficulties and administrative cases, administrative trial work in reality faced defects are inextricably linked, and therefore, since 2002, have been carried out around the pilot reform of administrative cases of cross-regional jurisdiction, namely the jurisdiction of different overlapping administrative cases centralized and administrative cases under the jurisdiction of reform. Both work in the early reform has achieved some success, but with the continuous progress of the pilot, both inter-regional jurisdiction reform in varying degrees of exposure to certain problems.With the party’s eighteen sessions of the Third and Fourth plenary session and the new "Administrative Procedure Law," the implementation of the revised administrative cases under the jurisdiction of inter-regional ushered in a new turning point. As an opportunity to take advantage of some areas in the implementation of the railway courts tachieve inter-regional pilot jurisdiction of administrative cases. While still in the implementation of the reform, but has been very obvious problems exposed.How to cross-regional administrative cases under the jurisdiction of the path selected is the question we need to seriously consider. First is the need to clear the value of cross-regional administrative jurisdiction cases should be to achieve the pursuit of justice in administrative and security plaintiff subjective position. Second, in the specific design of the system is relatively concentrated from the jurisdiction of a gradual transition to the administrative court mode. Finally, in the proceedings to focus on fair and efficient.