China And South Korea Of Today’s Elite Men Penhold Players Technical And Tactical Characteristics Of The Anti-adhesive Comparative Analysis

Penhold anti-plastic play as our traditional style of play in the history of thedevelopment of our country repeatedly spectacular tennis, table tennis in China has madetremendous contributions. With the continuous development of world table tennis technology,engaged in anti-adhesive Penhold athletes play less and less. Currently, only a few of theROK athletes still insist on this play, and keep the world advanced level. In this paper, theROK excellent anti-adhesive players on behalf of Wang Hao Penhold, Xu Xin and RyuSeung Min tee section, and then serve segments and segments stalemate technical Statisticsand analysis, South Korea Penhold proven anti-adhesive characteristics and tactics of playcompared to the points pray. China and South Korea in order to summarize the play Penholdanti-adhesive strengths and weaknesses in the current technical and tactical aspects found inSouth Korea sought from Penhold players technical and tactical anti-adhesive differences inthe use of the number, effect, etc., to identify and South Korea Penhold athletes at thesimilarities and differences in the specific techniques and tactics, from the details we finddeficiencies, learning Korean players strengths, its essence, abandoned its dross, expect todraw valuable research results at the same time, be able to propose targetedrecommendations, so that our athletes play Penhold anti-adhesive can be more rational use ofthe technical and tactical game in the future, to find support data for future training andcompetition, truly and actually a good combination of training and competition theorytogether to provide scientific theories refer to further improve our technical and tactical playPenhold anti-adhesive. Main conclusions are as follows:1Chinese Penhold player control the placement of the tee is more rigorous, threateningand controlling better serve the Korean Penhold player; But South Korea Penhold player lineselection richer.2Chinese Penhold player score means more to grab the hair segment, relying on theattact class technology to seize the initiative, Taiwan’s strong inroads capacity; KoreaPenhold player sights fierce forehand, strong Yijizhiming ability; When the opponent pickserve ideal control when the effect of Chinese Penhold players handle the ball better.3Third Round Chinese Penhold player connected directly serve the ability to use technology and the use of the platform ball better than Korea Penhold player, but are lesseffective use of hand picked.4in a stalemate, the Chinese Penhold player scoring relatively balanced forehand andbackhand, forehand and backhand all have a certain amount of pull, anti-pull capability.Korean Penhold player excellent footwork, running large range of offensive abilityconsecutive forehand, backhand is a fatal weakness.5Overall, Chinese Penhold technical and tactical play diverse, flexible, technicaldetail, closer to the trends of table tennis; Korea Penhold play player has certain advantagesin the forehand technique and footwork, but also more able to meet the new era of tabletennis on the speed and power requirements.