| This paper analyzes the use of techniques and tactics in 20 major competitions between Ma Long and Ochalov in 2016-2018 by means of documentary method,video observation method,four-segment index analysis method,mathematical statistics method and logical analysis method.And in the analysis to add innovative indicators for a better study of the tactical characteristics of the two,better improve Ma Long's technical and tactical level,in the future encounter Ochalov can formulate more targeted tactics to make the theoretical basis.Through research and analysis,the following conclusions are drawn:1.Ma Long maintains an absolute advantage in winning rate against players(foreign players)who play mainly in arcs,and not less than foreign players in winning rate against fast break opponents.Ochalov,as a "elder brother" in the table tennis world of Germany at the present stage,has some experience in the competition between fast break and arc circle players,but it is obviously inferior to Ma Long in the face of other players.2.In the overall technical and tactical evaluation,Ma Long's main advantages are reflected in the scoring rate of "excellent","good" in the other three paragraphs,prominent advantage in Ma Long,balanced in the other three,and more comprehensive in the use of techniques and tactics.In the evaluation of Ochalov,the advantage is not outstanding,and the scoring rate is only "good";compared with Ma Long,it is better than Ma Long.3.In the use of the overall tactics of the serve wheel,Ma Long's serve line and landing point are mainly in the middle line near the net(area 2),supplemented by the bottom line long ball;the whole serve line of Ochalov is similar to the landing point,but the change of the service landing point is slightly stronger than that of Ma Long.In the use of 1-3 board tactics,both of them have been close to the net or semi-issued the main tactics of the two men,and the difference is not obvious,but the overall enthusiasm of firing and robbing is better than that of Ma Long.1-3-5.Both men were mainly in the offensive tactical combination,the use rate of which exceeded 60%.Ma Long did not have Ochalov in the attack rate.The ability of the third board to deal with the ball is better than that of Ochalov,and in the use of the tactics of the service wheel holding,the two men have the best scoring effect in the active confrontation,and the scores are above 45%,but the enthusiasm of the attack is stronger than Ma Long.There was no significant difference in the distribution of scoring area between the two men,both of them were concentrated in the bottom line,and the backhand had two big angles(7,9),including the middle approach to the net(2).4.In the overall technical and tactical use of the receiving wheel,both of them mainly use offensive technology in the backhand stage,Ochalov uses frequency higher than Ma Long,backhand twisting technology is the main receiving technology of Ochalov;On the spot of receiving and sending,the difference of the two people's common "hot zone" is not big;2 area,7 area,9 area are the two people's common "hot area";In the 2-4 board tactical combination,both of them are dominated by continuous attack tactics in offensive technology.Ma Long is slightly better than Ochalov in the attack rate,but there are also shortcomings in the use of 2-4-6 board tactical combination,both of which are dominated by continuous attack.But Ochalov sense of continuous attack is stronger than Ma Long's,the tactical use of defense after attack and control.Also occupy a higher proportion,Ma Long is more obvious,reached 60,only 30.775,Ma Long needs to strengthen service skills.On the tactical combination of receiving and sending round,both of them are active interlocking,in which the pressure opponent backhand score is the best,but on the whole,Ma Long is more than Ochalov,the ability to finish the first six boards of Ma Long needs to be strengthened. |
PDF Full Text Request