Study On The Tactical Application Of Xu Xin In The Quarter Finals Of The Men’s Singles Of The 33^rd And 34^th Sessions Of Table Tennis World Cup

The Chinese table tennis continued to write myths in London Olympics of 2012,including making an entire monopoly of all the gold medals, in the face of another Olympic cycle, the competition within the Chinese table tennis team is extremely fierce.From 2012 to 2013, Xu Xin took part in the Table Tennis World Cup twice in a row. Judging from the two competitions, the exposed problems of Xu Xin in the 33 rdsession of Table Tennis World Cup have been improved in the 34 th session of Table Tennis World Cup. Under the action of good technique and mentality, Xu Xin won the firstchampionship of the three major events in his career, which lays the foundation of hitting the Grand Slam in the future as well as the Olympic Games of 2016. This paper takes this as an opportunity, using methods of document literature, video observation, mathematical statistics and logical analysis, and then it takes the quarter finals of the two Table Tennis World Cups from 2012 to 2013 as the example, carrying out a comprehensive analysis from the tactical perspective, mentality’s change and playing condition, finding the failure factors of Xu Xin in the 33 rd session as well as the winning factors in the 34 th session including the aspect that needs to be strengthened. The research showed that:1, Xu Xin’s forehand attack and stalemate ability are far more powerful than backhands, and the use of weight is obvious stronger than backhands. In the context of absolute leading scores, he is easy to use forehand to make good performance, while in the case of deficit, using forehand to increase the proportion so as to narrow the margin.2, The direct scoring rate of Xu Xin’s attack tactics after service is not high, and the return tactics of service is dominated by drop short control, which can effectively inhibit the assaults of others. And his receiving and serving attack is dominated by screw pulling, with a single landing, and the quality is not very good,the effect of picking attack is not obvious, and the usage has decreased to some extent.3, The technology of straight racket hits is relatively weak, and it is easy to cause unnecessary errors, and the close-table continuous offensive capability is not strong, mainly creating an opportunity for forehand attack. The sideways stalemate initiative is the most prominent, and the line’s change is clear and obvious.