Chinese And Foreign Outstanding Badminton Mixed Doubles Players Technique Using Comparative Research

The new format, Chinese badminton team can very good to adapt to the changes in the rules of the game, continue to maintain leading position. However, badminton mixed doubles as a skill in the higher a project in China are greatly influenced by it. Especially with the European countries such as the badminton mixed doubles projects as compared to a kind of social sports, competitive sports in our country of trophyism restrain the development of the mixed doubles projects. At present, the development of the mixed doubles projects abroad gradually appear beyond the momentum of the mixed doubles projects in China, the advantage of China’s mixed doubles projects past no longer exists.This paper is designed based on the Chinese and foreign outstanding badminton mixed doubles players after the game change, competition, serve and return the third bounce the ball using effect and its impact on goal difference and the final score statistical analysis research, find Chinese mixed doubles players what are the advantages and disadvantages compared with foreign mixed doubles players. At the same time, according to the corresponding technology, using the operational countermeasure, infinitely magnify the advantages of Chinese mixed doubles players, rectification of disadvantage, for our badminton mixed doubles players in training and competition in the future can more effectively improve the level of competition to provide the beneficial reference.In this paper, by using literature method, video observation, expert interview method, mathematical statistics and so on a series of sino-foreign mixed doubles player hit the ball technology has carried on the statistical analysis, respectively for serving placement area, receiving technology usage, and better effect to use the third bounce the ball. The research results show that the Chinese outstanding mixed doubles players and foreign excellent mixed doubles the gap in the player to serve serve change is less, the attack on the back is not enough, lack of threatening, lack of repressive receiving technology used, the third initiative is not strong, active scoring methods are too single, mixed doubles combination of passive score much higher than rivals such as China.