2013-2014NBA Finals The Spurs And The Heat With The Use Of Comparative Annlaysis Technology

As one of the most important restraining factors of basketball competitions,the use of technology and play directly determines the result of the game.Through documentary, expert interview method, video observation andmathematical statistics, in2013-2014NBA finals the spurs and the heat in game5of offensive and defensive technology and proving inconclusive technologysystem comprehensively, explore the high level of basketball game winningfactors, find out the cause of the victory and defeat, basketball training andcompetition for the future work to provide reference opinions. The mainresearch conclusions are as follows:(1) The first round: the SAN Antonio spurs insider technology is stable, thepenalty points, efficiency, three binary winning goal scoring, assists thetechnical efficiency, the spurs advantage, caused opponents score, binary ball score, binary and3-pointers contribution the spurs below the heat; The firstround of the spurs in tight defense technology play weak in Miami.(2) The second round: the SAN Antonio spurs in the shooting on the totalnumber of dominant, more assists, but inside bad game, shooting percentage isnot high, the heat of main high shots and higher free-throw line, binary ball(close shot) contribution, fast-break points, the post and opponent mistakescaused by scoring the heat play situation better than their opponents in the gamethan the spurs; The Miami bench press good play defense and backcourtrebounding technology caused the spurs appear more mistakes.(3) The third round: the SAN Antonio spurs in the game, three contribution,bench in scoring contribution rate, total score efficiency, shots, shot, assists,steals the ball, blocked shots from technology, fast-break points technology andinsider technologies are higher than the heat; The spurs in the3main attack,binary attack technologies in timeliness of weak in Miami.(4) The fourth round: the SAN Antonio spurs player, bench scored fromclose range than Miami has a higher efficiency, shot shot, free throw shooting,rebounds, assists, offensive rebounds, and back the spurs3-point percentagedoes not show the larger gap,3contribution rate is lower than the heat; In stealsthe ball technology and tight defensive technology caused opponents mistakes,both teams did not show a clear advantage.(5)The fifth round of shooting techniques, scoring efficiency, the spurs wasbetter than competitors, especially the sub’s advantage is more obvious; In assists, fast break, steals the ball technology aspect, the spurs occupy obviousadvantage in the game, the heat efficiency of low pass, rely too much onpersonal technology storm is also the important cause leading to the final defeat.(6)Averaged comparison results: the spurs bench offense to assume a moreoffensive role, and Miami too much dependence on key players. The SANAntonio spurs in the basket overall attacking skills and close shot technologyplay better than that of the heat; The spurs binary ball, three hits, scoringefficiency, free-throw line, averaging assists, his rebounding Numbers, closeshot effect of technology, and press the opponent mistakes techniques werehigher than in the heat; On the whole, the spurs, rather than the heat insidescoring, but the heat of the big players inside is stronger, and substitutes the posttechnical ability are relatively poor compared with the spurs bench.