Non-agricultural Employment, Production Inputs, Agricultural Output And Farmers

Since reform and opening, with the rural agricultural labor force to non-agricultural fields, forming a farmers’ diversified production patterns. Farming and increase the sources of household income on the one hand, it also caused a change in the mode of agricultural production inputs. So, for Farming and the influence of production inputs, farmers and farmers agricultural output aspects, different scholars in this field conducted in-depth analysis of this, some scholars primarily concerned Farming and income effect, that non-farm gainfully employed to stimulate investment in agriculture, some scholars main concern is the effect of the loss of farmers and industry, that non-farm payrolls due to the loss of agricultural labor undermined the efficiency of agricultural production.This article (CHNS) in household agricultural sub data based on China Health and Nutrition Survey. Using generalized propensity score method (GSM) to study the impact of Farming and loss and income effects and Farming and behavior of agricultural net income, after controlling for Farming and "self-selection" bias, we in each industry and the degree of influence on the examined sample of farmers and the agricultural industry output. Most studies in non-farm payrolls and variable directly as agricultural output arguments, this paper will deal Farming and degree as a continuous variable, the variable is seen as a result of farmers in agricultural output, and then each degree of industrialization It examines the impact of industrialization on farmers and agricultural output, thus solving the model estimation results endogeneity bias caused fundamentally. In addition, the model also takes into account differences between different types of households, to discuss the internal mechanism of the effects of different types of non-farm employment of farmers in agricultural output, on the basis of the impact of agricultural land also controls the size of the model.The results show that:1, the loss of effect Farming and for planting farmers and horticulture farmers, are significant, Farming and the income effect only for the control of the time and location factors of farming households is not significant.2, and the degree of industrialization in some sub-interval can increase agricultural output of farmers, on the whole, Farming and the degree of agricultural output was "inverted U" shaped relationship, that is, with the farmers and agricultural output of the industry increase the degree first and then decreased.Based on the conclusions, we obtained the corresponding policy implications, and provide reference for the promotion of agricultural output and farmers’ income growth and stable "three rural" policy measures.