| ObjectiveThis study evaluated the Chinese version translated and pelvic floor muscle exercise self-efficacy scale (Broome Pelvic Muscle Self-Efficacy Scale, BPMSES) reliability and validity, for better evaluation of urinary incontinence pelvic muscles, the evaluation of urinary incontinence and to improve quality of life.MethodsIn November 2012 to June 2014, the English scale pelvic floor muscle exercise self-efficacy scale (Broome Pelvic Muscle Self-Efficacy Scale, BPMSES) translated into Chinese, Jinzhou City, Liaoning Province, a hospital for urinary incontinence 210 cases were investigated. Implementation of this project is mainly literature review, the pre-test questionnaire, a formal survey the scene, after the recovery and analysis of questionnaire data entry, writing papers and other steps to complete the study of this subject. The research team after obtaining the consent of the original scale of the scale and its revised translation. First by two medical English is very good exercise pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation division will scale translated into Chinese, two rehabilitators are experts in the field of rehabilitation, which in English means another very good English rehabilitation division will scale back Chinese version translated into English, and mailed to the author, please post it on the back-translated scale review, the formation of the first draft of the Chinese version. Professor of rehabilitation will be mailed to the Chinese version of the first draft of the country has a wealth of clinical experience, experts and psychologists, please review it on this scafe modifications. Entries 1 "if you can make the best of its ability to exercise pelvic ffoor" to "I can do my best ability pelvic floor exercises." Then select 17 incontinence pelvic floor muscle training in patients with pre-test, based on the test results further modifications, eventually forming Chinese version BPMSES scale. Survey data were double entered after verification SPSS statistical software, build the database, and then analyzed statistically. Build a database and data using SPSS17.0 statistical analysis. Use of descriptive statistical analysis, Spearman correlation coefficient, Cronbach's reliability coefficient, factor analysis and other methods evaluated the reliability and validity of the Chinese version BPMSES. Use Amosd.O confirmatory factor analysis.ResultsThe total questionnaire Cronbach's coefficient of 0.912. Expected self-efficacy and outcome expectations scale Cronbach's coefficients were 0.845,0.941.2 weeks total, expected test-retest reliability of self-efficacy scale and expected results 0.910,0.841 and 0.935, respectively. In this study,23 entries in the scale of analysis and the results show, KMO value is 0.789, Bartlett test of sphericity approximate chi-square value of 2115.261 (P<0.001), suggesting that the scale items between common factors exist that can factor analysis. Using principal component analysis to extract common factors to eigenvalues greater than a factor of inclusion criteria for the public, and then after a great variance orthogonal rotation, this study was six common factors, the study of the Chinese version of the software application Amos BPMSES scale confirmatory factor analysis. Meanwhile, after the release of error values e1 and e6, e2 and e4 relationship based model updating index, again analysis and the results show the model fit indices were improved. The study results fit well the model, the model significance probability value P= 0.325, greater than 0.05. With a total score of each entry in Table score Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.311-0.753 (P<0.01), suggesting that there is a significant correlation between the total score of 23 entries in the table with a score.ConclusionChinese version BPMSES has good reliability and validity, can be used to evaluate patients with urinary incontinence pelvic muscle exercise self-efficacy. |
PDF Full Text Request