| Objective: To compare laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy,two surgical treatment of early ovarian cancer(I-IIa)the safety and feasibility analysis.Methods: in the period of2006-2016 treatment in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University Department of gynecology and diagnosis of early ovarian cancer patients,and in our hospital underwent radical surgery,surgery the patients were divided into laparoscopic radical resection of early ovarian cancer and abdominal radical resection for early ovarian cancer,will meet the inclusion criteria of patients according to different surgical methods were divided into experimental group received(underwent laparoscopic surgery)and control group(treated with open operation)by SP.The operation time of SS software in the two groups of patients,intraoperative bleeding,pelvic lymph nodes,length of hospital stay,postoperative complications,postoperative anal exhaust time,were analyzed.Results:100 cases of patients with early ovarian cancer related clinical cases were included,including 63 cases of LPS(observation group: Laparoscopic the treatment of early ovarian cancer(LPT)patients and 37 cases of control group: after open surgery in the treatment of early ovarian cancer)patients,two received surgical treatment,the amount of bleeding of the two groups were compared intraoperative,postoperative complications,the overall length of hospital stay,postoperative anal exhaust time below The control group,the difference between the two groups compared with wasstatisticallysignificant(P<0.05).The operation time,there was no significant difference in all pelvic lymph node dissection(P<0.05).Conclusion: the surgical clinical treatment of early ovarian cancer,laparoscopy,safety and feasibility of better treatment for early ovarian cancer related complications.Intraoperative and postoperative and poor prognosis,has certain application value in clinic. |
