Font Size: a A A

Establishing The Model Of Human Hypertrophic Scar Fibroblasts With Mechanical Stimulation

Posted on:2018-08-03Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Y S LiFull Text:PDF
GTID:2334330536470075Subject:Clinical Medicine
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective To establish the hypertrophic scar fibroblasts(HSFB)model with human normal skin fibroblasts(NSFB)induced by mechanical stress.Methods Dermal tissues of normal skin and hypertrophic scar from 3 donors were cultured in vitro.Normal skin fibroblasts(NSFB)and hypertrophic scar fibroblasts(HSFB)were divided into the experimental group and the control group.Experimental groups were loaded with 0.1Hz,10% amplitude sine-wave cyclic stretch for 3,5 and 7 days respectively.Control group were cultured without cyclic stretch.Each experiment was repeated 3 times.At the end of experiments,morphological changes were observed with an inverted microscope;collagen type I and transform growth factor ?1(TGF-?1)in culture supernatant was detected by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA);SYBR Green real time quantitative PCR detection system(q PCR)was used to detect the expression level of p130Crk-associated substance(P130Cas),Integrin-?1,TGF-?1,procollagen type I and ?-Smooth muscle actin(?-SMA);Protein Integrin-?1 and P130 Cas were detected by Western-Blot(WB)method.The data were expressed as x ?±s.S-N-Ka test was completed when a significant ANOVA was observed(p < 0.05)to determine groups that were significantly different from each other.Results 1)The morphology of cells: cells of the experimental group proliferated actively with apparent orientation.While in the control group,the cell proliferation was slow and without orientation.2)ELISA results: loaded with 5 days,the collagen type I and TGF-?1 in culture supernatant from experiment group of NSFB and HSFB were with no significant differences(P > 0.05),control groups of HSFB and NSFB,the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05).Loaded for 3 days and 7 days,differences between each group were statistically significant(P < 0.05);loaded for 3 days,the concentrations of collagen type I and TGF-?1 in NSFB experiment group are lower than that of the HSFB control group;while loaded 7 days,the concentrations of collagen type I and TGF-?1 in NSFB experiment group are higher than that of the HSFB control group.3)SYBR Green q PCR results: loaded for 3 days,compared to NSFB control group,P130 Cas,Integrin-?1,TGF-?1 procollagen type I m RNA expression levels of NSFB experiment group were statistically different,(P < 0.05);?-SMA m RNA expression level showed no difference(P > 0.05).When loaded for 5 days,compared with HSFB control group,expression levels of P130 Cas,Integrin-?1,TGF-?1 procollagen type I and ?-SMA of the NSFB experiment group were no significant differences(P>0.05);while loaded for 7 days,the above indexes showed differences(P<0.05).4)WB results: Loaded for 3 days,the expression levels of P130 Cas and Integrin-?1 from NSFB control and experiment group showed no statistically different(P>0.05).When loaded for 5 days,compared to HSFB control group,the expression levels of protein P130 Cas and Integrin-?1 from NSFB experiment group are with no statistically significant difference(P > 0.05),the difference between HSFB and NSFB control group was statistically significant(P < 0.05).While loaded for 7 days,the above indexes showed differences(P<0.05).Conclusion The HSFB model can be successfully constructed with sine-wave cyclic mechanical stress of 0.1Hz and 10% amplitude for 5 days.
Keywords/Search Tags:hypertrophic scar, mechanical stress, fibroblasts, model
PDF Full Text Request
Related items