Evaluation Of Intervention Effect Of Five Elements Music Therapy On Patients With Chronic Pain

Objective:Through the four-week intervention of “Five elements of music” in patients with chronic pain,to explore the influence of five elements of music therapy on pain,psychological status,and quality of life of chronic pain patients.It provides evidence for the clinical treatment and nursing of chronic pain and the popularization and application of five elements music therapy in clinical practice.Methods:A total of 66 patients with chronic pain who were treated in Shanxi Acupuncture and Moxibustion Institute from July 2016 to December 2016 were randomly divided into treatment group and control group,33 cases in each group.The patients in the control group were given routine treatment care and health education.The patients in the treatment group were treated with five elements music therapy on the basis of the routine group.Two groups of patients were treated for 4 weeks of continuous care,followed by one month of follow-up.Observe the pain level,anxiety,depression,and quality of life before and after nursing in both groups.Results:1.Baseline comparisonBefore the intervention,the general data(age,gender,occupation,education level,marital status,family economic status,number of pain sites,and disease course)of the two groups were not statistically different(p>0.05),and they were comparable.Before the intervention,the scores of the SF-MPQ,the SAS,the SDS,and the SF-12 were compared.The differences were not statistically significant(p>0.05)and they were comparable.2.Pain levelComparisons within group :After the intervention,the SF-MPQ score,sensory score,affective score,visual analogue scale score,and pain assessment index score of the treatment group decreased compared with those before the intervention,and the difference was statistically significant(p<0.05).In the control group,the SF-MPQ score,sensory score,affective score,VAS score,and PPI score decreased after intervention.And the difference was statistically significant(p<0.05).Comparison between groups:After the intervention,the SF-MPQ score,sensory score,affective score,VAS score,and PPI score of the treatment group were lower than those of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(p<0.05).3.Psychological conditionsComparisons within group:In the treatment group,the SAS and the SDS score decreased after the intervention.And the difference was statistically significant(p<0.05).In the control group,the SAS and the SDS score decreased after the intervention,and the difference was statistically significant(p<0.05).Comparison between groups:After the intervention,the SAS and SDS score of the treatment group were lower than those of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(p<0.05).4.Quality of lifeComparisons within group:The scores of all dimensions of SF-12 in the treatment group were higher than those before the intervention,and the difference was statistically significant(p<0.05).After the intervention of the control group,the scores of all dimensions of SF-12 were higher than those before the intervention,and the difference was statistically significant(p<0.05).Comparison between groups:After the intervention,the scores of all dimensions of SF-12 in the treatment group were higher than those in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(p<0.05).Conclusion:1.Five elements of music therapy can relieve the psychological state of anxiety and depression in patients with chronic pain.2.Five elements of music therapy can relieve pain in patients with chronic pain.3.Five elements of music therapy can improve the quality of life in patients with chronic pain.