Thinking Of Hermeneutik-A Review Of Gadamer's " Wahrheit Und Methode"

Gadamer's book "Wahrheit und Methode", it is difficult to understand the main reason is that he uses the descriptive language, the language is not like the Logical language, from concept to judgment and reasoning, abstracts the universality to reach a common understanding from individual, but pay attention to the description of the state of individual existence. Descriptive language expressed in escaping the existence of individual experience, a lot of help in rhetorical terms, especially is the similarity of the metaphor. Gadamer's position is consistent philosophy: the problem is something beyond our desire and action together with us, rather than what we should do. In his book, he just to objectively describe the phenomenon of understanding, does not discuss should be how to, but a beyond the desire and behavior of interpreter and a priori what happened with interpreter, he's just describe the actual situation. This stance thanks to him in the phenomenology and dialectics of thinking training.The truth in Art experience, Resisting common requirements of the scientific method, the truth of modern natural science concept is just one of many ways to know the world. Kant's aesthetics also ignored the truth of art's request, he make aesthetic theory is very narrow. Gadamer, from the perspective of the game concept, ruled out a way of thinking of subject-object dichotomy, think the game itself is composed of the player and the viewer the unification of the whole, the game is the existing way of self-expression. A work of art like to watch the game, it also is the real existence of the performance and the interpretation process. Gadamer's "aesthetic no distinction between", namely the works of art and its representation or explanation unifies, think the truth of art exists only in the infinite in the process of mediation between the past and present. Art truth is neither work, but exists in the understanding and explanation in the process of the infinite.So Gadamer extends the artistic experience to the entire spiritual domain scientific theory, The spirit of science knower also participate in itself, not a scientific methodology can control, history of truth is by no means immutable, always with the knower how experience history the way of things, the truth is concrete and practical. In gadamer's contribution to a series of key concepts. such as See before: action, in the process of understanding is a kind of traditional resolutely cannot be considered an act of subjectivity. Any understanding in essence is to work through See before, See before is by no means obstacles, but understanding conditions; Horizon fusion: this is a dynamic process, the history and the present, the unity of subject and object constitute a infinite, in time is historic, is synchronic in space; Effect history: history is a kind of implementation process, effect refers to the function, and effect of history is something to produce and implement its own history, including the unity of history and of historical understanding. Is the most innovative application: it is in a particular time and in a specific situation to understand it. Hermeneutics is a practice of knowledge, has the openness and problematic, only made some problem horizon, to achieve the correct understanding.Language led to the ontology of hermeneutics to the center of the status. Language is the common medium for hermeneutic experience; Has immanent unity with the language and things, not separation. Language not by induction and deduction, but depend on the expansion of the experience, similarity by the parables. Far from the natural form with the scientific concept of forming language; Language as the world's experience, not the kind of world knowledge structure based on rational logic. Experience with science in here is irrelevant; Human linguistic world experience do not contain the objectification of the world, that is to say we live in the world, belonging to it, language of the world can only be understood from within, by living in it, understanding of it is not objective; As light only through its content become visible to make themselves visible, language has enabled the world to the function of the performance and continue to exist. Presence itself, only in the language, to clarify what is the language of light. It is in the field of independent in as the aesthetic consciousne ss of main body, also not independent on the language, gadamer's hermeneutics thinking and broader cultural background phenomenology and dialectics on the synthesis of the trinity.