Research On The Relationship Between Anger,Moral Judgments And Aggression Of College Students

Emotional system is an important system of individual psychological motivation, has effect on the behavior of the individual, the individual life and adapt to the social significance. Novato believes that anger as a negative emotion to predict aggressive behavior can play to a certain extent. But some recent studies have found that the mood of the subjective factor will be the individual's moral judgment effect. In the face of the same emotional stimuli, different individuals have different emotions, how to play the role of moral judgment in the process, in order to change or control our behavior. Therefore, this study from the evoked anger of the combination of moral judgment and aggressive behavior on the relationship between the three, to provide some help to reduce and control the attack behavior.This study adopts Diener and Efnraons(1984) revised emotional self rating scale to test the emotional. Using the revised Liu Huijun, Gao Hong Mei state anger scale, anger expression scale. Attack of the moral judgment questionnaire by Yao Li, Wang Meifang et al in 2009 on the MRA questionnaire Chinese version, measurement of explicit aggressive behavior by Buss and Perry in the preparation of the revised Chinese version of aggressive behavior questionnaire and paper implicit aggressive stem fill pen test questionnaire. Hebei University of 230 undergraduates as the object of study by the collation and analysis of data, anger among college students emotion, moral judgment and aggressive behavior in the control variables on the differences in characteristics, and three between relations. Furthermore, we investigated the moral judgment between anger and aggressive behavior in the intermediary role. Research results showed:(1) there is a significant difference in the gender, urban and rural areas and grades of anger among college students. Specific performance: in anger expression in general boys scored significantly higher than girls, and in anger expression variables on internal control dimension was significantly higher in males than females; differences between urban and rural areas on the feelings of anger dimensions significant differences, rural average were higher than city average. That is, the country's experience of anger is higher than the city's anger experience; grade differences in the sense of anger on this dimension have a significant difference, with the grade increased, the feeling of anger is also increased;(2) the overall and various dimensions of College Students' moral judgment in gender, urban and rural areas and whether there is no significant difference between the only child and grade;(3) there is no significant gender difference in the whole attack behavior of college students. Only in physical aggression, the male body attack is significantly higher than that of female students. The implicit aggression and the differences in each dimension were not significant. Only the implicit verbal aggression was significantly higher than that of boys. In grade two, the implicit verbal aggression in grade was significantly higher than that in first grade. The difference between urban and rural areas, the city impulse attack is significantly higher than that of rural. Aggressive behavior in whether the only difference is not significant;(4) college students' anger judgment have negative effects on morality;(5) college students' moral judgment has significant negative predictive effect on aggressive behavior;(6) college students' anger have significant positive predictive effect on aggressive behavior;(7) the moral judgment plays a part intermediary role in the relationship between explicit state anger and attack in the. Moral judgment has a mediating effect on the influence of implicit attack in anger.