The Debate Over "the Aestheticization Of Everyday Life" And The New Tendency Of The Development Of Science Of Literature

It was the abundant accumulation of material products that impacted the formation of "The aestheticization of everydaily life" in western countries.The recombination and optimization in the aspect of industrial structure,the sharp increase in the amount of leisure time,the enhancement of the consciousness of consumer culture,the development of culture media industry are the performance of four aspects of the abundant accumulation of material products.In addition,Heller’s promotion the meaning of"the everyday life",Featherstone’s analysis of the gradual fusion phenomenon of "the everyday life" and aesthetic in the realistic society,and Welsch ’s analysis of the level aesthetic in the field of aesthetic theory,in short,the formation of the thought of daily life,the construction of the theory of consumer society,and the reconstruction of the theory of Aesthetics in the consumer society is the formation of theory of " the aesthetic daily life" in western academic basis.The phenomenon of "aesthetic generalization" appeared in the transformation period of the society-culture of China.With the tendency of globalization,the theory of"the aestheticization of everyday life" in western countries spread to China.The phenomenon and the theory caused a domestic reflection on science of literature theory,and as a direct result of the crisis of science of literature,the academic debate of "the aestheticization of everyday life" started.When it comes to the meaning of "the aestheticization of everyday life",the first and foremost to be told was meaning of it.Some scholars,such as Yue-di Liu,Shu-yuan Lu,had different understanding of "the generalization of aesthetic" and "aestheticization of everyday life".A fierce debate over "the aestheticization everyday life"was the combination of the debate about "the aestheticization everyday life" and the debate about the border of science of literature.The debate over "the aesthetic daily life" focused on the context of it and the value judgment on it,at the same time,the debate of the border of science of literature focused on the dispute of mobile boundary of science of literature.In the debate of "the aestheticization of everyday life",the one-sided understanding of the reality context and the wrong-understanding of the view of opposition caused the collision of views and the exchange of ideas.About of the analysis of the premise and phenomenon of "the aestheticization of everyday life",some scholars,such as Guo-hua Zhu,Wen-zhen Jiang,Yong Zhao,Qing-bing Tong and Zhi-rong Zhu,objected to the understanding of Dong-feng Tao about of the performance,the main group and the significance of theory of "the aestheticization of everyday life" The most important reason of the conflict among Shu-yuan Lu,De-sheng Wang,Yong Zhao,Dong-feng Tao about the value of the judgment of’ the aestheticization of everyday life" was the dislocation of the values and the thinking ways.The debate of "the aestheticization everyday life" provided a theoretical premise and object for the debate of the boundary of the discipline of science of literature.Tue to the former debate,the latter debate was more specific.And the latter debate has a relationship with the attitude of the scholars who dealt with "the aestheticization everyday life".Trans-boundary " Was or not?It was a question about the development of the discipline of science of literature.The debate of the literary and art was represented by the argument between Qing-bing Tong and Dong-feng Tao,and it provides a new perspective for the development of the discipline of science of literature.These are the questions of the debate of the "trans-boundary" of science of literature:How do the literary and art treat the Cultural studies?Reference to the Cultural studies?How to Reference?What is the specific standards and requirements of it?The debate of the boundary of the literary and the debate of "the aestheticization everyday life" are related to each other in theory.They provided a theoretical direction and plan for the development of science of literature.Combine of the ancient and modern,learn and apply it.They are the right way of academic innovation.In the face of reality,science of literature reflection on the debate and tells us that we need to pay attention to humanistic care,pay attention to interdisciplinary development,pays great attention to international academic exchanges.Science of literature has the characteristics of interdisciplinary,we should take the advantage of it.In the 1980 s,combined with science of literature theory and aesthetics formed the aesthetics of science of literature,in the 90 s,science of literature theory and the ecology combining to form the ecological literature.In addition,aesthetics and ecology are combined to form the ecological aesthetics.Because of ecological crisis of literary theories itself in our country,science of literature are supposed to combine aesthetics and ecology criticism to be ecological aesthetics of literature and art development model,to form a "from outside to inside-from the inside out-from outside to inside-from the inside out" model of development.