Study On Argumentation Acceptance In Court Under The Perspective Of Legal Conversation Reasoning

Legal conversation reasoning is the practical reasoning with natural language as carrier.During the judicial process,all party engaged in the conversation will make legal reasoning through effective communication and debates on the basis of understanding the meaning of other’s session.In the field of civil,administrative,criminal areas are reflected. In criminal trials for example,form interrogating criminal suspect,achieving testimony of witness to court investigation,the burden of cross-examination,court argumentation and judgment,these are by presenting a debate session law process.In this paper,based on the law court session as the corpus,in the perspective of legal session reasoning,accept the questions of the court debate in study.Because in the entire link in the court,the accuser and the defender will be their argumentation in the first place intentionally or unintentionally,they may refuse the object detrimental to oneself.So argumentation acceptance throughout the course of the trial.In court argumentation acceptance,the accuser and the defender may be the main body of acceptation,in the end,the chief judge clears the judgment through a series of legal reasoning of the session.So,the process of the argumentation acceptation in court cannot do without legal conversation reasoning,with the pragmatic theory of legal conversation reasoning can better guide the argumentation acceptation in court.There are three sections in this paper:The first section:Legal conversation reasoning in general.Legal conversation reasoning is a reasoning at first,in this part,presents the basic theory of reasoning simple combing and for the below,mainly the connotation of the reasoning,the validity and the rationality of the reasoning,the definition of legal reasoning and consistency.Then summarize the connotations and features on legal conversation reasoning.The second section:Argumentation in court and argumentation acceptance in court.The court debate illustrates mainly form the argument and logic origin,the court debate and the relationship between argumentation and reasoning.For the argumentation acceptance in court,elaborating the factor.The Third section:Argumentation Acceptance in court under the perspective of legal conversation reasoning. This is a key and difficult points.Mainly form the three aspects are analyzed:efficiency evaluation on legal conversation reasoning,legal conversation context and principles.