| In recent years,in social change.As the cases of administrative omission increasingly,the administrative litigation showed a trend of increase gradually,but the administrative litigation commonly encountered in reality difficult case and so on.This paper around the administrative omission cases,case study and comparative analysis methods for the empirical analysis of these cases.The analysis cannot leave the understanding of the key terms.This paper on the analysis to the connotation and constitument.Although our country in 2014 to modify "administrative procedural law",the new "administrative procedural law" in 2015 on May 1,have gone into effect.The case scope of the administrative nonfeasance of course have limitations.Administrative omission cases in trial court system,aparting from strictly abide by the law.In such case the scope of accepting cases should combine academic theoretical explanation to grasp.This paper discusses four of academic theoretical explanation are analyzed in detail.Constitutive requirements,the key to China's judicial documents online administrative omission cases as the analysis object,to our country administrative omission cases are divided into nine types of specific empirical analysis.The empirical analysis from the basic case,the first-instance judgment situation and second instance court case analysis.Make a more comprehensive analysis in cases of classification.By using the method of diagram,the various types of administrative omission cases analysis more clear.At the end.Based on the above for specific types of administrative omission cases detailed empirical analysis.To understand China's existing administrative not as a specific type of case.Getting the case scope of the administrative nonfeasance of course have limitations.Coming up with positive recommendation.Causing for concern ultimately,either in the judicial practice or the administrative law scholars focus on scope of accepting cases of administrative omission. |
PDF Full Text Request