People’s Assessors Assessor Standardized Research Report

Further improve the jury system is not only an important part of China’s new round of judicial reform people,but also to enhance the quality of people’s assessors assessor basic protection.The third plenary session of the 18 decision is put forward,the people’s jury system should be widely practised,widen the channel of the people’s orderly participation in judicial.18 decided to further clarify the fourth plenary session of the proposed,to guarantee the people to participate in the judicial,perfecting the system of people’s assessors,protect the rights of citizens jury,expand audit scope,perfect the way of glendale,improve the people’s jury system credibility.People’s jurors are no longer applicable law shall be gradually practised problem,only to participate in the trial of the fact that problem.At the top of the series is designed for the people’s juror system reform has been clear about the direction and goals.Taking Shanxi Province as the sample rate to the assessor,the assessor process standardization,quality and efficiency assessor three secondary indicator system to quantify the evaluation criteria in the literature analysis,questionnaire,depth interview data based on statistical analysis,Shanxi Provincial people’s juror assessor irregularities mainly in five aspects,namely the people’s jury trial participation rate is not balanced,the assessor guarantee unfavorable lower quality assessor,assessor rigid mechanism,function and value assessor alienation.Which led to people’s assessors assessor does not regulate itself mainly include system design flaws,the system is running in the "interests" interfere with the judicial system and restrictions on traditional jury system in three areas.Finally,to further implement the people’s jury assessor five areas targeted measures standardized.The full text is divided into four parts:The first part:the status of the province People Jurors Construction System.Specific analysis includes the following eight areas:sex structure,age structure,occupational structure,educational structure,political affiliation structure,regional structure,mode selection,implementation of the plan to double and so on.The second part:the people of the province juror assessor standardized empirical analysis.This section mainly uses statistical analysis of literature data,questionnaire and in-depth interviews obtained to rate assessor,assessor and assessor process quality and efficiency evaluation index system for the quantification of the province people’s assessors assessor standardization objectively describing system.The third part:The people’s assessors assessor irregularities and performance analysis of the causes.Specified that our people juror assessor does not regulate the five forms that is the people’s jury trial participation rate is not balanced,safeguard people’s assessors assessor unfavorable people’s assessors assessor lower quality,people’s assessors assessor rigid mechanism,people’s assessors assessor function and value of alienation.Through the analysis of the above acts,summed up the reasons for irregularities in people’s assessors assessor,including system design flaw itself,the system is running in the "interests" interfere with the judicial system and restrictions on traditional jury system.The fourth part:The realization of people’s assessors and demonstrates the basic countermeasures of than standardization.Specific include the following five aspects:appropriate balanced than rate,strengthen the role and security,improve the quality of than,than mechanism,fully realized than function and value.