Research On The Judicial Acceptability Based On Subjective Procedural Justice

In the increasingly complex and diverse social context,the judiciary is facing more and more challenges.It is a common phenomenon that public seek justice is no longer just a simple fair result and factors that affect the judicial acceptability also become diverse and multiple.If the level of public judicial acceptability slides lower and lower,it will produce a series of legal risks.Absolutely,judiciary advocates pursuit of reason and fairness,however,we had to respect the most basic human emotions.Thesis study the relationship between subjective procedural justice and judicial acceptability by the method of empirical.research,starting with the perception of public.Thesis is divided into four parts.The first part is an overview of judicial acceptability.Firstly,highlight the object of study through the definition and description of the basic content and features of judicial acceptability,which was defined as the level of social psychology,rather than a legal methodology category(Of course,legal methodology will also have an impact on the judicial acceptability);secondly,analyse its necessity;and then describe the theoretical basis of the study--Procedural Justice and Relational Model of Authority;finally,summarize current research about the relationship between subjective procedural justice and judicial acceptability,providing a theoretical basis for the later research.The second part consists of two sections,mainly including the quantitative research design of judicial acceptability.The first part is the overall design of the quantitative research of judicial acceptability,containing research purpose,research model,research variables,research hypotheses and research procedures.The second block shows the basic situation of the subjects,and tests the reliability and validity of empirical studies.The third part is analysis of the data,we first examines the research model,then analyzes the current state of judicial acceptability and subjective procedural justice based on the obtained research data,explores the relationship between the procedural justice?the substantive justice?the factors of traditional culture and judicial acceptability.Among the conclusions,the most important is to find some factors in subjective procedural justice have a significant positive impact on the judicial acceptability.The fourth part is the conclusions of the thesis.In the first part,it combs the testing of research hypothesis,and summarizes the research conclusions.Then,we base on the aforementioned research data and theory,combine with the reality of the judicial system,present some advice to enhance public judicial acceptability from the ethics of procedure?the rules of procedure?the psychology of the public and the judicial environment perspective.