The Legal Boundary Of The Freedom Of Speech From We Media

The rapid development of the Internet has brought tremendous changes to people's lives.The We Media relying on the network is breaking the way of traditional information dissemination.The We Media,on its own instant interaction,concealment,easy to operate and so on,provides an excellent platform for the realization of freedom of speech.It makes a reality that everyone has the right to speak,and the common people are "journalists".The speech of We Media plays an irreplaceable role in realizing the citizen's freedom of speech,making knowledge progress and pursuiting truth and advancing the democratic process of our country.But everything has two sides.The emergence of We Media has added vigor to the freedom of speech,but some violations of public interests and other people's legitimate rights and interests occur frequently.Thus,clearing the legal boundaries of freedom of speech from We Media is becoming increasingly necessary.The legal boundary means the protection and limitation of law,the exercise of rights within the boundary should be protected,and beyond the boundary should be restricted or even punished.Through the description of the concept of We Media,and the analysis of recent cases related to the speech of We Media,this paper presents the boundary between the speech of We Media and other rights,and draws lessons from other countries' restriction principles on freedom of speech,then analyzes the present situation and shortcomings of the legal regulation on the freedom of speech from We Media in China,and proposes the feasibility suggestions from the aspects of legislation and industry self-discipline.Within the boundary,the freedom of speech should be protected otherwise limited.And the relevant authorities should grasp the degree of restrictions.Ultimately,the We Media's speech is moving in a more normative direction.The legal boundary is actually the relation between freedom and order.In the game of freedom and order,find the equilibrium point,and realize the best state of both.Hope to maximize the realization of the freedom of speech.