The Study On People's Advisory Jury System

Fair and justice is the eternal value of justice,efforts to let the people in every judicial case feel fair and justice is the requirements of the times.To realize the fair and equitable value of justice,it is necessary to improve the public transparency of the judiciary,but also to fully promote litigation democracy.For this purpose,our judicial practice departments and legal theory has also been unremitting exploration.The fundamental purpose of the reform of the system of people's jurors is to give full play to the role of the people's jurors as a bridge between the administration of justice and the public,and ultimately to achieve fairness and justice.Henan Province People's Court system in the people's jurors system reform practice to explore the people's advisory jury group system,this opens up a new way to realize the organic combination of litigation democracy and judicial credibility,but also for our country to achieve fairness and justice to introduce a modern type of reference model.Although our country has also implemented a review system in modern history,It is different from our current judicial practice to explore the people's advisory jury system.This article discusses the theory of people 's advisory jury system,analyze its value,comparative analysis of relevant systems,in order to uncover the mysterious veil of the people's advisory jury system.The first part mainly introduces the background,significance,literature review and research methods of the research.The prominent phenomenon of social phenomena caused by justice and the people in the real world of misunderstanding and contradictions deepened,and the increase in public participation in judicial enthusiasm have accelerated the urgency and arduousness of the reform of the people's jurors.The second part of the review system for a general overview,analysis of the difference between modern view and modern view,and to Henan Province,the pilot of the People's advisory jury system as a perspective to carry out the relevant system of discrimination.The third part introduces the background of the production of Henan Province and Taiwan with the people's advisory jury system,the system construction to run the effect.The fourth part focuses on the necessity of the people's advisory jury system to solve the dilemma needs of the people's juror system in theory and practice.The fifth part analyze its value.The next points out that there is a shortcoming in the design of the people's advisory jury system,and the path of perfecting the rules: Adjust the conditions of selection,The parties and the court start double track system,the trial and the legal trial of the separation mechanism and to strengthen the validity of the facts,the order of the participants in the proceedings,the introduction of the list of issues such as the five aspects of the proposed.The last part is the conclusion of this article,expounded the people's advisory jury system still need to accept the continuous examination of social practice,people's jury reform road still need to continue to explore.