Identification Of Intentional Homicide And Intentional Injury Death In Judicial Practice

On the specific provisions of criminal law in our country,the crime of murder and intentional injury(to death)are two different charges,and for murder and intentional injury(of death)were compared for clear rules,two charges is not can' t can depend on is indistinguishable or define,but due to the regulation of our country on the two specific provisions of criminal law crime is relatively simple,so in reality quite,the criminal suspect' s crime plot and tend to be more complex,lead to public security,prosecution,courts in case of qualitative differences often appear,the main reason is that these two kinds of cases objectively has some similarities,especially lethal damage and confusing intentional homicide in the judicial practice.As a result,it can lead to in the judicial confirmation process is difficult to grasp the problems in practice,and therefore occur two SINS on that of the many differences.Make the two crimes in the judicial practice can be correctly identifying and as far as possible to reduce the ambiguity,reflect the national judicial justice is,and put an end to being more key.In order to correctly identified case nature,appropriately,the criterions for the conviction of taking criminal case example for analysis of import,and with examples and analysis of inductive analysis methods,such as,combined with the specific criminal case case,in the judicial practice that murder and intentional injury(of death)possible ambiguity and correctly define the corresponding analysis,to murder and intentional injury(to death)in cognizance of crime in the judicial practice reason,make the reader more clearly distinguish the difference between the two crimes,through understanding murder and intentional injury(to death)identified in crime in the judicial practice,let the\"arms\" is deeply rooted in the hearts of the people of the law.