Judicial Identification Of Intentional Assault Crimes

In recent years,the crime of intentional injury was a multi-trend,the incidence of high conviction rate.The crime of intentional assault as a common crime,nor cause theorists,especially the attention of the judiciary.Leading to the judicial practice of crime and non-crime,the crime and the crime of blurring the problem.These controversial issues will inevitably lead to the same case of different sentencing issues,leading to not properly punish crimes,protect human rights,to achieve justice.This article mainly discusses the distinction between aggravated death caused by intentional injury in the judicial practice and the distinction between death result in intentional homicide,comparison,analysis and evaluation of subjective responsibility,whether there is intentional homicide and intentional homicide in the same crime.problem.The theory of "the result is worthless" has been used to distinguish the objective law from the subjective responsibility strictly.It follows the law of the subjective and objective unification of criminal law in our country,and has a reference to the theory of criminal law.This paper uses the experience and experience of the author in the judicial practice to summarize and classify the distinguishing criteria of the crime of intentional homicide,intentional homicide and the related crime,as well as the intentional injury in the same case.On the Model of Determining the Joint Crimes in the Act of Murder.It is expected that this kind of effort will inspire judicial practice.