Comparative Analysis Of The Use Of Defensive Tactics Of The Chinese Men's Basketball Team And The Opponents In The Thirty-first Olympic Games

The thirty-first Olympic Games men's basketball team and opponents China comparative analysis of the use of defensive tactics as the research object,this paper mainly adopts the method of literature survey and video observation and other research methods,combined with the comparative analysis of the video game Chinese basketball with his opponents in the game using the tactical,tactical and tactical type process results,the conclusions are as follows:1.It is not difficult to find,from the thirty-first session of the Rio Olympic Games men's basketball game in the world,the high level basketball team defense idea is always implement the "ball,ball,and the principle of balance area," according to a changeable situation,the use of flexible defensive tactics to deal with the key,and the level of defense is more prominent,reflects the new concept of modern basketball defense.2.In the thirty-first session of the Rio Olympic Games,in addition to Venezuela's men's basketball team,China basketball its opponents use common characteristics of defensive tactics are to man to man defense tactics,the second is the use of fast break defense zone,mostly in the use of tactical changes,mixed defense and integrated defense only occasionally use.Compared to the opponent's flexible tactics,the defensive tactics of the Chinese men's basketball team is too single,change is less,not according to the opponent's attack mode and timely make corresponding adjustment.3.China half man to man defense team to use the most defensive tactics,especially the use of narrow half man to man defense.China team took advantage of their height advantage inside,but in poor tactical execution,lack of relief,defense and anti complement the tacit understanding between the players,the defense team moved slowly,high center of gravity,failed to effectively carry out press,holding on ball players.From the average points per game can be seen,defensive tactics as the overall success rate is higher than that of Chinese team.4.In the fast break defense,compared to Chinese team and their opponents,back slowly,consciousness is not strong,the players back to the anti defense organizations with division of labor is not clear,the lack of understanding,the defense effect is poor.5.From the five game China team to the full court press and a man to man defense times can be seen,Chinese team obviously less than the other competitors in the physical reserves,as well as the use of physical confrontation process tactics weaker than the other team.