Clinical Study Of The Effect Of Drug Can Therapy On Visceral Fat Metabolism In Abdominal Obese People

Abdominal obesity,also known as "central obesity"(or visceral obesity)refers to excessive fat deposition in the abdomen or abdominal viscera.A large number of studies have found that abdominal obesity is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes,hypertension,hyperlipidemia,fatty liver and other chronic diseases.In recent years,more and more people are abdominal obesity,so the development of effective means of prevention and control has come to an urgent point.1 Purpose of studyThis study is to disscuss the effect of drug therapy on visceral fat metabolism in abdominal obesity crowds and the effect mechanism of drug-cupping therapy on visceral fat metabolism in abdominal by observing the clinical effect of drug-cupping therapy on visceral fat metabolism in abdominal obese patients.Drug-cupping therapy provide evidenc e on the effectiveness of abdominal obesity visceral fat metabolism.2 Research methodsFrom August 2016 to January 2017 in Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Dong fang Hospital,acupuncture and moxibustion clinic outpatient patients,selected in line with the inclusion criteria of 60 subjects and take a random number table method,were randomly divided into treatment group.The treatment group was 30 cases,the control group was 30 cases.The treatment group was treated with drug-cupping and treated twice a week for 8 weeks,during the treatment asked the subjects eat less food and more exercise.The control group using blank waiting for observation,the subjects in the control group are not treated.During the observation period asked the subjects eat less food and more exercise.After the end of the observation period,the drug-cuping can be given according to the subjects’ requirements for compensatory treatment.The investigators measured the indexes of the two groups before and after treatment,and used the statistical software SPSS20.0 for statistical analysis.3 Research resultAmong the 60 subjects who had received the study,there were 6 cases of falling off and eliminated,54 cases were completed,27 cases in the treatment group and 27 cases in the control group.3.1 Comparison of the thickness of abdominal fat and UVIIn the treatment group subcutaneous fat thickness(S1、S2)visceral fat thickness(VI,V2),left anterior fat thickness(AHF),right adrenal fat thickness(PRF)were lower than those before treatment,(P<0.05).Visceral fat index(UVI)was no evident difference before and after treatment(p>0.05).There were no significant differences in the levels of SI,VI,S2,V2,AHF,PRF and UVI in the blank waiting observing group before and after observation(P>0.05).There was a significant difference in the levels of S1、V1、S2、V2、AHF and PRF between the therapy groups after the treatment and the control groups after observation(p<0.05).UVI was no significant difference between the therapy groups after the treatment and the control groups after observation(P>0.05).The difference value of the two groups before and after treatment about S1、V1、S2、V2、AHF and PRF was significant difference(p<0.05).The difference value of the two groups before and after treatment about UVI was sno ignificant difference(p>0.05).3.2 Comparison of serum visfatinThere was a significant difference in the treatment group before and after the treatment(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the blank waiting observing group before and after the treatment(P>0.05).There was a significant difference between the therapy groups after the treatment and the control groups after observation(p<0.05).The difference value of the two groups before and after treatment was significant difference(p<0.05).3.3 Comparison of simple body fat parametersBody weight(BW),waist circumference(WC),hip circumference(HC),waist and hip(WHR)and body fat index(BMI)were significantly lower than those before treatment in the treatment group(p<0.05).BW,WC,BMI and WHR were significantly higher than those before observation in the blank waiting observing group(p<0.05),and HC was no significant difference in the blank waiting group(p>0.05).There were significant differences in HC and BMI between the therapy groups after the treatment and the control groups after observation(p<0.05).There was no significant difference in BW,WC and WHR between the therapy groups after the treatment and the control groups after observation(p>0.05).The difference value of the two groups before and after treatment was significant difference(p<0.05).3.4 Effective comparison0 cases were cured,4 cases were markedly effective,20 cases were effective,the total effective rate was 88.9%,in the blank waiting observing group 0 cases were cured,0 cases markedly effective,8 cases were effective,the total effective rate was 29.6%%,The efficiency of the two groups were compared.The two group were significantly different,(p<0.05).4 ConclusionThrough the clinical study of 54 subjects with abdominal obesity,drug-cupping therapy has a good effect on improving visceral fat metabolism in abdominal obese crowds.Through the comparison between the two groups,the difference between the two groups was significant,suggesting that drug-cupping therapy is a safe and effective method to treat abdominal obesity,clinical can be used to promote.