The Debate On Marxism In China In The 1930s And 1940s

In the 1930s and 1940s,it was the period of the outbreak of the Anti-Japanese War in China and a major political and cultural transition.Ideological circles,theorists and the various political parties putted forward various political parties and cultural thought.The situation is complicated,because its purpose is for the disaster enveloped China to seek an advanced scientific theory,to guide the Chinese revolution to victory.At this time,the Communist Party of China seize the relatively mature time,putting forward the proposition of Marxism in China,proposition once raised aroused the enthusiastic response from all walks of life,but also by the Kuomintang strong opposition,which led to the KMT and the CPC on The Debate of Marxism in China.With the increasing the trend and the degree of controversy gradually deepened,it inspired the rise of the academic movement in China.The focus of the debate gradually shifted to the academic of China.The academic movement of the progressive theory is aimed at laying a solid foundation for the proposition of Marxism in China,pointing out the development of theoretical practice and ensuring that the Marxist theory of Chinese is characterized by its scientific,revolutionary,rational and practical standing in the Chinese society.At the same time,for the Communist Party of Chinese,theoretical innovation in the continuous deepening and improvement promotes its scientific practice and ultimately lead the Chinese proletarian revolution to win.This article focuses on the arguement on the "Marxism in China" between the Marxist and anti-Marxist.After collecting a large number of articles on the controversial view,this article deeply explores the Chinese historical and cultural background in the 1930s and 1940s.From the analysis of the Marxist theory of China’s contemporary environment,the process of controversy,the causes of controversy and the value of the controversial meaning,we explore and think about Marxism in China and academic in the political level and the value and contribution of academic theory from the dperspective of the Kuomintang game.We understand from the overall process of Marxism in China to understand and grasp the historical value and significance of the arguement in this period;and through the debate we can explose the process of the Marxist Chinese scientific practiced and theory deepened,and understand its intercourse and close integration with Chinese culture,Chinese practice.This article includes the introduction,the text,the conclusion.The introduction of a chapter includes the reasons for choice of the subject,meaning;the lastest research and writing methods and innovations.The second part is the text,including the second,third,fourth and fifth chapters.The second chapter analyzes the historical background of the debate on Marxism in China in the 1930s and 1940s.The controversy took place in the context of the full outbreak of the Anti-Japanese War.Specifically,the political background at that time was the cooperation between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party,the establishment of the anti-Japanese national united front.However,there was a struggle within the united front.Cultural background is the never stopping debate between the cultural conservatism and Marxist since the spread of Marxism in China.In addition,the Marxist school of the Communist Party of China after various setbacks and tests finally established in this period,and its cultural thinking matures.The third chapter discusses the process of argumentation of Marxism in China in the 1930s and 1940s.First of all,after the localization of Marxism in China,the scope of influence gradually spread to the Kuomintang,causing the Kuomintang vigilance.Secondly,the Kuomintang anti-Marxists launched a debate with the Communist Marxist about this proposition.Thirdly,the three stages of the debate:the beginning of the debate,the struggle about scientific of Marxist theory in China;the development of the debate,the rationalization of the path of Marxism in China;the deepening of the debate,the struggle about academic of the Marxism in China.The process of conciliation is deep and the academic clamor becomes more and more intense,which constitutes the core argument of the article.In the fourth chapter,the author analyzes the causes of the debate on Marxism in China in the 1930s and 1940s.The direct cause of the dispute is the conflict between the interests and the political ideology of the Kuomintang and the Communist Party.The root cause of the debate is the difference between the attitude and the degree of cognition on Chinese and foreign academic and cultural thoughts between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party.In addition,the real factors that can not be ignored is the change of attitude between the middle forces and intellectuals in the ideological and theoretical circles,which together constitute the cause of this controversy.Chapter 5:History meaning on the Debate of Marxism in China in the 1930s and 1940s.From the overall historical process of Marxism in China,this debate has deepened the scientific practice and theoretical maturity of Marxism in China.At the same time,the debate laid a deep foundation and basic course for Marxism in China.The debate also highlights the outstanding contributions made by the Chinese Marxist school in this debate and in advancing the process of Marxism in China.The third part:concludes.The localization of Marxism in the 1930s and 1940s has a very important role in the whole history of Marxism in China.Especially the rise of the academic Chinese movement offer a high degree of academic support and scientific and rational practice path to the political theory.Through this debate between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party,we can have a comprehensive grasp of the historical origins and development path of Marxism in China during this period.We have a profound understanding of the theoretical basis of Marxism in China and a clear and correct understanding of relationship between the localization of Marxism and the localization of academic in China.